[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Databases::
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 20, Issue 4 (12-2018) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2018, 20(4): 69-76 Back to browse issues page
Shoulder joint strength assessment in people with subacromial shoulder impingment
Amir Letafatkar1 , Hadi Abbaszadeh Ghanati *2
1- Assistant Professor of Sport Injury and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. letafatkaramir@yahoo.com
2- Ph.D Candidate in Sport Injury and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran , hadi.handball@gmail.com
Abstract:   (11950 Views)
Background and Objective: Recent conservative management of sub-acromial shoulder impingement (SSI) includes general strengthening exercises, especially for internal (IR) and external (ER) shoulder rotators. Despite various studies, so far, there is no directly investigated for indicating the difference in muscle strength between patients with SSI and normal subjects. This study was done to compare the shoulder joint muscles’ strength in male students with and without SSI.
Methods: This case-control study was conducted on  Twenty-four students with SSI as case group and 24 normal students as controls.The subjects in both groups matched for hand dominance and physical activity level, completed isokinetic shoulder IR and ER testing. In the case group, 18 patients had the symptoms in their dominant and 6 patients in their non-dominant side. Both sides IR and ER of shoulder were measured separately using continuous reciprocal concentric and eccentric contraction cycles at speed of 60 and 120 degrees per second, respectively. Values of peak torque were compared between the case and control groups.
Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups only when the symptomatic SSI shoulder was the dominant shoulder. Eccentric and concentric ER peak torque at 120 degree per second (22.20±7.01, 11.36±3.36), eccentric ER peak torque at 60 degree per second (20.53±6.15) and eccentric IR peak torque at 60 degree per second and 120 degree per second were significantly lower in the symptomatic dominant shoulder case group in compared to the dominant shoulder control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Changes in eccentric and concentric peak torque in SSI group may be related to limb dominance, which may have implications for strengthening regimes. Therefore, clinicians and therapeutic exercise expertise may benefit from eccentric isokinetic exercises for shoulder IR and ER rotators in order to design a treatment plan for patients with SSI.
Keywords: Sub-acromial shoulder impingement, Peak torque, Shoulder rotation
Full-Text [PDF 233 kb]   (21489 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Rehabilitation
References
1. Page P. Shoulder muscle imbalance and subacromial impingement syndrome in overhead athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Mar; 6(1): 51-8.
2. Lewis JS, Green AS, Dekel S. The aetiology of subacromial impingement syndrome. Physiotherapy. 2001 Sep; 87(9): 458-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60693-1
3. Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy: a model for the continuum of pathology and related management. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Oct; 44(13): 918-23. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.054817
4. Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med. 2009; 43(4): 259-64. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.052183
5. Hébert LJ, Moffet H, Dufour M, Moisan C. Acromiohumeral distance in a seated position in persons with impingement syndrome. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Jul; 18(1): 72-9.
6. Hallström E, Kärrholm J. Shoulder kinematics in 25 patients with impingement and 12 controls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jul; 448: 22-7.
7. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Translations of the humerus in persons with shoulder impingement symptoms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 Jun; 32(6): 248-59.
8. Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Subacromial space width changes during abduction and rotation--a 3-D MR imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999; 21(1): 59-64.
9. Johnston TB. The movements of the shoulder-joint a plea for the use of the’plane of the scapula'as the plane of reference for movements occurring at the humero-scapular joint. Br J Surg. 1937; 25(98): 252-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800259803
10. MacDermid JC, Ramos J, Drosdowech D, Faber K, Patterson S. The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Nov-Dec; 13(6): 593-98. doi: 10.1016/S1058274604001247
11. Land H, Gordon S. Clinical assessment of factors associated with subacromial shoulder impingement: a systematic review. Phys Ther Rev. 2017; 21(3-6): 192-206. doi: 10.1080/10833196.2016.1274355
12. Holmgren T, Hallgren HB, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K. Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Oct; 48(19): 1456-57. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-e787rep
13. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther. 2000 Mar; 80(3): 276-91.
14. van Meeteren J, Roebroeck ME, Selles RW, Stijnen T, Stam HJ. Concentric isokinetic dynamometry of the shoulder: Which parameters discriminate between healthy subjects and patients with shoulder disorders? Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2004; 12(4): 239-46. doi: 10.3233/IES-2004-0181
15. Blume C, Wang-Price S, Trudelle-Jackson E, Ortiz A. Comparison of eccentric and concentric exercise interventions in adults with subacromial impingement syndrome. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Aug; 10(4): 441-55.
16. Tyler TF, Nahow RC, Nicholas SJ, McHugh MP. Quantifying shoulder rotation weakness in patients with shoulder impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec; 14(6): 570-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.03.003
17. Land H, Gordon S, Watt K. Isokinetic clinical assessment of rotator cuff strength in subacromial shoulder impingement. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Feb; 27: 32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2016.11.012
18. Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Nov; 36(5): 936-42. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.5.936
19. Letafatkar A, Rajabi R, Tekamejani EE, Minoonejad H. Effects of perturbation training on knee flexion angle and quadriceps to hamstring cocontraction of female athletes with quadriceps dominance deficit: Pre-post intervention study. Knee. 2015 Jun; 22(3): 230-36. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.001
20. Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec; 4(4): 143-49.
21. Land H, Gordon S. What is normal isokinetic shoulder strength or strength ratios? A systematic review. Isokinetics and exercise science. 2011; 19(4): 231-41. doi: 10.3233/IES-2011-0427
22. Kuhlman JR, Iannotti JP, Kelly MJ, Riegler FX, Gevaert ML, Ergin TM. Isokinetic and isometric measurement of strength of external rotation and abduction of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Oct; 74(9): 1320-33.
23. Dulgeroglu D, Kirbiyik E, Ersoz M, Ozel S. Evaluation of shoulder rotational strength in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome using a computerized isokinetic dynamometer. J of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2013; 21(1): 23–30. doi: 10.3109/10582452.2013.763393
24. Akyol Y, Yasemin U, Durmuş D, Tander B, Cantürk F, Bilgici A, et al. Shoulder muscle strength in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: its relationship with duration of quality of life and emotional status. Turkiye Fiziksel Tip ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2013; 59(3): 176-81. doi: 10.4274/tftr.59837
25. Erol O, Ozçakar L, Celiker R. Shoulder rotator strength in patients with stage I-II subacromial impingement: relationship to pain, disability, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Nov-Dec; 17(6): 893-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.043
26. Moraes GF, Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Scapular muscle recruitment patterns and isokinetic strength ratios of the shoulder rotator muscles in individuals with and without impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Jan-Feb; 17(1 Suppl): 48S-53S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.007
27. Anderson VB, Bialocerkowski AE, Bennell KL. Test–retest reliability of glenohumeral internal and external rotation strength in chronic rotator cuff pathology. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2006; 7(3): 115-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2006.04.002
28. Leroux JL, Codine P, Thomas E, Pocholle M, Mailhe D, Blotman F. Isokinetic evaluation of rotational strength in normal shoulders and shoulders with impingement syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul; (304): 108-15.
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Letafatkar A, Abbaszadeh Ghanati H. Shoulder joint strength assessment in people with subacromial shoulder impingment. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2018; 20 (4) :69-76
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-3542-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 4 (12-2018) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.03 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4714
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)