Thu, Aug 21, 2025
Volume 19, Issue 3 (May-Jun 2025)
mljgoums 2025, 19(3): 27-30 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shinde M, Dalal B A, Modak M S. Clinico-mycological profile of diagnosed cases of dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital, Pune: A Cross-Sectional Study. mljgoums 2025; 19 (3) :27-30
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1653-en.html
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1653-en.html
1- Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, India
2- Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, India ,bharatidalal.dalal67@gmail.com
2- Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, India ,
Abstract: (844 Views)
Background: Dermatophytes are keratinophilic fungi that cause superficial infections of the skin, hair, and nails. The prevalence of dermatophytosis is influenced by factors, such as climate, age, gender, lifestyle, and socioeconomic status. In tropical and subtropical regions, like India, hot and humid conditions contribute to its high incidence. This study aimed to isolate and identify dermatophytes from clinically diagnosed cases of dermatophytosis.
Methods: A total of 100 clinically diagnosed cases were examined by direct microscopy (KOH mount) and fungal culture on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and Dermatophyte Test Medium (DTM).
Results: The most common clinical presentation was Tinea corporis (42%), followed by Tinea cruris (25%) and Tinea unguium (21%). Out of 100 samples, 53 were culture-positive. The predominant isolates were Trichophyton rubrum (30%), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (20%), and Trichophyton violaceum (13.3%). Among culture media, SDA yielded 92.45% isolates, while DTM showed higher sensitivity (96.22%).
Conclusion: Isolation and identification of dermatophytes are crucial for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and epidemiological surveillance. Understanding the local prevalence and etiological agents aids in managing therapeutic challenges and preventing transmission.
Methods: A total of 100 clinically diagnosed cases were examined by direct microscopy (KOH mount) and fungal culture on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and Dermatophyte Test Medium (DTM).
Results: The most common clinical presentation was Tinea corporis (42%), followed by Tinea cruris (25%) and Tinea unguium (21%). Out of 100 samples, 53 were culture-positive. The predominant isolates were Trichophyton rubrum (30%), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (20%), and Trichophyton violaceum (13.3%). Among culture media, SDA yielded 92.45% isolates, while DTM showed higher sensitivity (96.22%).
Conclusion: Isolation and identification of dermatophytes are crucial for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and epidemiological surveillance. Understanding the local prevalence and etiological agents aids in managing therapeutic challenges and preventing transmission.
Research Article: Research Article |
Subject:
Microbiology
Received: 2023/04/11 | Accepted: 2024/11/26 | Published: 2025/06/22 | ePublished: 2025/06/22
Received: 2023/04/11 | Accepted: 2024/11/26 | Published: 2025/06/22 | ePublished: 2025/06/22
References
1. Namidi MH, Ananthnaraja T, Satyasai B. Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes by ABDD and E-Test, a comparative study. Open J Med Microbiol. 2021;11(3):129-43. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google scholar]
2. Chander J. In: Chapter 10, Textbook of Medical Mycology. 3rd ed. New Delhi:The Health Sciences Publisher;2009:122-47. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
3. Kannan P, Janaki C, Selvi GS. Prevalence of dermatophytes and other fungal agents isolated from clinical samples. Indian J Med Microbiol.
2006;24(3):212-5 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google scholar]
4. Bhatia VK, Sharma PC. Epidemiological studies on Dermatophytosis in human patients in Himachal Pradesh, India. Spingerplus. 2014;3:134 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google scholar]
5. Das S, De A, Saha R, Sharma N, Khemka M, Singh S, et al. The current Indian epidemic of dermatophytosis: A study on causative agents and sensitivity patterns. Indian J Dermatol. 2020;65(2):118-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google scholar]
6. Surendran K, Bhat RM, Boloor R, Nandakishore B, Sukumar D. A clinical and mycological study of dermatophytic infections. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59(3):262-7 [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Saxena G, Sadawarte K, Songara P, Mehta A. Clinico-mycological profile of dermatophytoses at a tertiary care teaching hospital of central India. SVU Int J Vet Sci. 2022;5(2):216-27. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google scholar]
8. Singh S, Beena PM. Comparative study of different microscopic techniques and culture media for isolation of dermatophytoses. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2003;21(1):21-4. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google scholar]
9. Sahai S, Mishra D. Change in spectrum of dermatophytes isolated from superficial mycoses cases: First report from central India.Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(3):335-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google scholar]
10. Hanumanthappa H, Sarojin K, Clinicomycological study of 150 cases Dermatophytosis in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(4):322-3.) [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google scholar]
11. Chanyachailert P, Leeyaphan C, Bunyaratavej S. Cutaneous fungal infections caused by dermatophytes and non-dermatophytes: an updated comprehensive review of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and diagnostic testing. J Fungi (Basel). 2023;9(6):669. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google scholar]
12. Doddamani PV, Harshan KH, Kanta RC, Gangane R, Sunil KB. Isolation identification and prevalence of dermatophytes in tertiary care hospital in Gulbarga district. People's J of Scientific Research. 2013;6(2):10-13 [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
13. Verenkar MP, Pinto MJ, Rodrigues S, Roque WP, Singh I. Clinico- Microbiological study of dermatophytoses. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1991;34(3):186-92. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Pandey A, Pandey M. Isolation and characterization of dermatophytes with tinea infections at Gwalior (MP). Int J Pharm Sci Investig. 2013;2(2):5-8. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
15. Bassiri-Jahromi S, Khaksari AA. Epidemiological survey of dermatophytosis in Tehran, Iran, from 2000 to 2005. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75(2):142-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Karmarkar S, Kalla G, Joshi KR, Karmarkar S. Dermatophytoses in a desert district of Western Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1995; 61(5):280-3. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Jain N, Sharma M, Saxena VN. Clinico-mycological profile of dermatophytosis in Jaipur,Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74(3):274-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Sumana V, Singaracharya MA. Dermatophytosis in Khammam (Khammam district, Andhra Pradesh, India). Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2004;47(2):287-9. [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Yavuzdemir S. Comparative evaluation of the isolation of the dermatophytes by direct laboratory evidence and MSDA with MDTM culture media. Mikrobiyol Bul. 1992;26(4):367-72 [View at Publisher] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Enamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.