Thu, Apr 18, 2024
Volume 16, Issue 4 (Jul-Aug 2022)
mljgoums 2022, 16(4): 47-53 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ogliari K S, Immig M L, Halon M L, Loth F, Boni L, Grudzinski P, et al . Development of a Validation Protocol for Laboratory Personnel Training in Sperm Analysis and Cryopreservation(brief report). mljgoums 2022; 16 (4) :47-53
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1464-en.html
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1464-en.html
Karolyn Sassi Ogliari 
1, Monica Luiza Immig2 , Maria Laura Halon2 , Fabrízio Loth2 , Luiza Boni3 , Patrícia Grudzinski2 , Liziane Beckenkamp2 , Martina Fritsch2
1, Monica Luiza Immig2 , Maria Laura Halon2 , Fabrízio Loth2 , Luiza Boni3 , Patrícia Grudzinski2 , Liziane Beckenkamp2 , Martina Fritsch2
1- Hemocord Biotechnology, São Leopoldo, Brazil , karolyn@hemocord.com.br
2- Hemocord Biotechnology, São Leopoldo, Brazil
3- University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil
2- Hemocord Biotechnology, São Leopoldo, Brazil
3- University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, Brazil
Abstract: (2232 Views)
Background and objectives: Semen cryopreservation is widely used in assisted reproduction techniques, and reliable semen analysis is essential to define the clinical practice. However, many parameters used for semen evaluation have high variability among technicians. Here, we describe a method of validating semen analysis prior to cryopreservation, comparing each operator’s results with an expert, and also analyzing inter-operator variability. As a second endpoint, we compare this method by analyzing semen parameters before and after cryopreservation.
Methods: Four professional trainees studied and practiced semen analysis according to the World Health Organization guidelines for one month, under supervision of an expert in the field. Next, microscopic results (sperm concentration, motility, vitality, and morphology) obtained by each team member were compared with the findings obtained by the expert.. Finally, analyzes of inter-operators were evaluated for the same parameters.
Results: The findings obtained by the operators and the expert did not differ significantly. Furthermore, in the inter-operator analysis, the morphology parameter differed significantly in the fresh semen sample, which was not observed in the post-thaw sample.
Conclusion: Our results indicated that the laboratory staff training for semen analysis was effective, ensuring the assessment of individual performance and uniformity among operators in sperm count parameters, producing consistent results.
Methods: Four professional trainees studied and practiced semen analysis according to the World Health Organization guidelines for one month, under supervision of an expert in the field. Next, microscopic results (sperm concentration, motility, vitality, and morphology) obtained by each team member were compared with the findings obtained by the expert.. Finally, analyzes of inter-operators were evaluated for the same parameters.
Results: The findings obtained by the operators and the expert did not differ significantly. Furthermore, in the inter-operator analysis, the morphology parameter differed significantly in the fresh semen sample, which was not observed in the post-thaw sample.
Conclusion: Our results indicated that the laboratory staff training for semen analysis was effective, ensuring the assessment of individual performance and uniformity among operators in sperm count parameters, producing consistent results.
Research Article: Brief Report |
Subject:
Laboratory Sciences
Received: 2021/11/23 | Accepted: 2022/02/12 | Published: 2022/07/16 | ePublished: 2022/07/16
Received: 2021/11/23 | Accepted: 2022/02/12 | Published: 2022/07/16 | ePublished: 2022/07/16
References
1. Baskaran S, Finelli R, Agarwal A, Henkel R. Diagnostic value of routine semen analysis in clinical andrology. Andrologia. 2021; 53(2): e13614. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1111/and.13614] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. (World Health Organization, 2010). [View at Publisher]
3. Filimberti E, Degl'Innocenti S, Borsotti M, Quercioli M, Piomboni P, Natali I, et al. High variability in results of semen analysis in andrology laboratories in Tuscany (Italy): the experience of an external quality control (EQC) programme. Andrology. 2013; 1(3): 401-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI:10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00042.x] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Lam, M. T. et al. A prospective study of variations in conventional semen parameters among local andrology laboratories. J. Mens. health 17, 95-100 (2021). [Google Scholar]
5. Sikka, S. C. & Ayaz, A. Standardized Semen Analysis and Quality Control Management for Multicenter Male Reproductive Toxicology Clinical Trials. in Bioenvironmental Issues Affecting Men's Reproductive and Sexual Health 371-386 (Elsevier Inc., 2018). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801299-4.00023-2. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-801299-4.00023-2]
6. Franken, D. Semen analysis workshops in India and Africa: the vital role of training and external quality control programmes. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261773015 (2013).
7. Gatimel, N., Moreau, J., Parinaud, J. & Léandri, R. D. Sperm morphology: assessment, pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and state of the art in 2017. Andrology vol. 5 845-862 (2017). [DOI:10.1111/andr.12389]
8. Engel, K. M., Grunewald, S., Schiller, J. & Paasch, U. Automated semen analysis by SQA Vision ® versus the manual approach-A prospective double-blind study. Andrologia 51, (2019). [DOI:10.1111/and.13149]
9. Agarwal, A., Henkel, R., Huang, C. & Lee, M. Automation of human semen analysis using a novel artificial intelligence optical microscopic technology. Andrologia 51, (2019). [DOI:10.1111/and.13440]
10. Daoud, S., Chakroun-Feki, N., Sellami, A., Ammar-Keskes, L. & Rebai, T. Inter-and intra-operator variability in the analysis of semen parameters: results from a quality control program. Pan Afr. Med. J. 25, 115 (2016). [DOI:10.11604/pamj.2016.25.115.9158]
11. Dai, C. et al. Advances in sperm analysis: techniques, discoveries and applications. Nat. Rev. Urol. (2021) doi:10.1038/s41585-021-00472-2. [DOI:10.1038/s41585-021-00472-2]
12. Gómez-Torres, M. J., Medrano, L., Romero, A., Fernández-Colom, P. J. & Aizpurúa, J. Effectiveness of human spermatozoa biomarkers as indicators of structural damage during cryopreservation. Cryobiology 78, 90-94 (2017). [DOI:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.06.008]
13. O'Neill, H. C., Nikoloska, M., Ho, H. T., Doshi, A. & Maalouf, W. Improved cryopreservation of spermatozoa using vitrification: comparison of cryoprotectants and a novel device for long-term storage. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 36, 1713-1720 (2019). [DOI:10.1007/s10815-019-01505-x]
14. Hezavehei, M. et al. Sperm cryopreservation: A review on current molecular cryobiology and advanced approaches. Reproductive BioMedicine Online vol. 37 327-339 (2018). [DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.012]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Enamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.