[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Sources::
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Articles Archive::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer-Review::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 23, Issue 3 (10-2021) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2021, 23(3): 77-83 Back to browse issues page
Employer's Exposure Risk to Electromagnetic Fields from Monitors of Computers in North of Iran
Ali Shahryari1 , Bibisalimeh Anehberdi Pourghezel2 , Arezoo Heidari3 , Mohammad Hadi Mehdinejad * 4
1- Associate Professor, Environmental Health Research Centre, Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
2- B.Sc in Environmental Health, Environmental Health Research Centre, Health Centre of Gomishan, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
3- M.Sc in Environmental Health Engineering, Environmental Health Research Centre, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
4- Associate Professor, Environmental Health Research Centre, Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. , hmnejad@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5962 Views)
Background and Objective: Overexposure to electromagnetic waves produces by computer cause health disorders by users. This study was performed to determine the employer's exposure risk to electromagnetic fields from monitors of computers in north of Iran
Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was performed on 100 of computers using by 100 employee users (69 males and 31 femals) with the mean age of 40.83±7.37 in Gomishan county, Golestan province in north of Iran during 2018. The intensity of the magnetic and electric field caused by computers was measured at 30, 50 and 60 cm intervals and in four directions from the front, back, right and left side of the monitor using SVENSK standard method. The intensity of fields was measured by TM-190 instrument. Data were compared with OEL (Occupational Exposure Limit), MPRII and TCO (The Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees). The NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) standard questionnaire was used to assess the side effects of working with computers. The health problems in employee users were recorded.
Results: The mean±SD of the intensity of the electrical waves was 103.63±33.62 v/m that was less than the standard values. The mean±SD of the intensity of the magnetic waves was 0.1±0.09 mA/m that was higher than the TCO, MPRII standard values and less than OEL. The maximum magnetic-field invasion from the standard range with an average of 157.04 mA/m is on the front of the monitors, at a distance of 30 cm and the lowest of them with a mean of 19.2 mA/m for the off-mode computer and at a distance of 60 cm from the mantle. There was a significant difference between the time of working with computer in the day with burning eye, headache and eye fatigue. There were no significant difference of clinical symptoms in men and women and fatigue syndrome.
Conclusion: The electrical waves of monitor of computers were lower than standard limit in all studied conditions, but the magnetic waves were much higher than standard limit.
Keywords: Computer [MeSH], Electromagnetic Fields [MeSH], Chronic Fatigue Syndromes [MeSH]
Article ID: Vol23-43
Full-Text [PDF 786 kb]   (11591 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Occupational Health
References
1. Markovà E, Hillert L, Malmgren L, Persson BRR, Belyaev IY. Microwaves from GSM mobile telephones affect 53BP1 and gamma-H2AX foci in human lymphocytes from hypersensitive and healthy persons. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Sep; 113(9): 1172-77. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7561 [DOI] [PubMed]
2. Rubin GJ, Hahn G, Everitt BS, Cleare AJ, Wessely S. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ. 2006 Apr; 332(7546): 886-91. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55 [DOI] [PubMed]
3. Farhang P, Jalilzadeh S, Kazemi A. Modeling and simulation of a wind farm in the presence of power electronic devices for the enhancement of transient stability. Simulation. 2013; 86(6): 735-45. DOI: 10.1177/0037549713481242 [DOI] [PubMed]
4. Ranjbarian M, Rezaee F. [Survey on severity of magnetic and electric fields around video display terminals and its association with health effects on operators]. Iran Occup Health J. 2009; 6(3): 17-21. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
5. Pall ML. Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depressionl. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep; 75(Pt B): 43-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed]
6. Stein Y, Udasin IG. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS, microwave syndrome) - Review of mechanisms. Environ Res. 2020 Jul; 186: 109445. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109445 [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Genuis SJ. Fielding a current idea: exploring the public health impact of electromagnetic radiation. Public Health. 2008 Feb; 122(2): 113-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed]
8. Otto M, von Mühlendahl KE. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)? Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Oct; 210(5): 635-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed]
9. The International Agency for Research on Cancer. Non-Ionizing Radiation: Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields. IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans. 2002. [View at Publisher]
10. Mortazavi SMJ, Ahmadi J, Shariati M. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007 May; 28(4): 326-30. DOI: 10.1002/bem.20305 [DOI] [PubMed]
11. Hilgenkamp K. Environmental Health: Ecological Perspectives. London: Jones & Bartlett Publishers International. 2005; pp: 30-35.
12. Bolghan Abadi S, Usefi H, Dehghan H. [Evaluation of electromagnetic fields intensity and its relation with eyestrain users]. J Health Sys Res. 2014; 9(12): 1293-1300. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
13. Samadi MT, Farasati F, Poormohammadi A. [Comparison of Non-Ionization Radiation Liquid Crystal Display with Conventional Display in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences]. Avicenna J Clin Med. 2014; 21(1): 49-57. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
14. Bellieni CV, Acampa M, Maffei M, Maffei S, Perrone S, Pinto I, et al. Electromagnetic fields produced by incubators influence heart rate variability in newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Jul; 93(4): F298-301. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2007.132738 [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Bortkiewicz A, Gadzicka E, Zmyślony M, Szymczak W. Neurovegetative disturbances in workers exposed to 50 Hz electromagnetic fields. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2006; 19(1): 53-60. DOI: 10.2478/v10001-006-0001-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
16. Deng AY, Wang EG, He JC. Effect of Structure Parameters on Power and Magnetic Field in Electromagnetic Soft-Contact Continuous Casting System. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2008; 15(1): 19-24. DOI: 10.1016/s1006-706x(08)60005-9 [Article] [DOI]
17. Golmohammadi R, Ebrahimi H, Fallahi M, Soltanzadeh A, Mousavi SS. [An investigation of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Electromagnetic field emitted by common Laptops]. Health Saf Work. 2014; 4(1): 11-20. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
18. Fouladi Dehaghi B, Ghamar A, Latifi SM. Electromagnetic Fields and General Health: A Case of LCDs vs. Office Employees. Jundishapur J Health Sci. 2016; 8(1): e33375. DOI: 10.17795/jjhs-33375 [View at Publisher] [DOI]
19. Meo SA, Al-Drees AM. Mobile phone related-hazards and subjective hearing and vision symptoms in the Saudi population. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2005; 18(1): 53-7. [PubMed]
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shahryari A, Anehberdi Pourghezel B, Heidari A, Mehdinejad M H. Employer's Exposure Risk to Electromagnetic Fields from Monitors of Computers in North of Iran. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2021; 23 (3) :77-83
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-3932-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 3 (10-2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4652