[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Indexing Databases::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 15, Issue 1 (3-2013) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2013, 15(1): 80-84 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of central venous and peripheral venous pressures in the antecubital region in coronary arterial bypass graft surgery
Hosseinnejad H * 1, Razzaghi M2
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch, Shahrood, Iran , hosseinnejadh@yahoo.com
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Abstract:   (13530 Views)
Background and Objective: Previous studies suggest a correlation of central venous pressure (CVP) and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) in different surgeries. CVP is one of essential monitoring during coronary arterial bypass graft (CABG). Canulation of peripheral venous catheter and PVP measurement is easier, whit less complication. This study was done to compare the central venous and peripheral venous pressures in the antecubital region in coronary arterial bypass graft surgery. Materials and Methods: This descriptive analytical study was done on 84 patients with American society of anesthesiology III with CABG surgery in Shafa hospital, Kerman, Iran during 2007. The technique of anesthesia was the same in all patients. CVP and PVP were measured every 20 minutes intervals before, on and after cardio-pulmonary pump. Data were analyzed using STAT-10, ANOVA and linear regression tests. Results: A total of 750 simultaneous measurements of CVP and PVP were recorded in all patients. The mean of CVP before of pump was 6.8±0.9 and the mean of PVP was 8.8±1. The mean difference between CVP and PVP was ±2 mmHg and this difference was significant (P<0.05). The mean of CVP on pump was 3.9±1 and the mean on PVP was 7.6±1. The mean difference of these two changeable was ±3.7 mmHg. This difference was significant (P<0.05). The mean of CVP after of pump was 6.5±1 and the mean of PVP was 8.5±1. The mean difference this two changeable was ±2 mmHg and this difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: PVP and CVP are related with each other on cardio-pulmonary pump even in severe hemodynamic condition. PVP and CVP changes are synchronized and PVP is a helpful clinical alternative for estimation of CVP.
Keywords: Central venous catheter, Peripheral venous pressure, Coronary arterial bypass graft
Full-Text [PDF 240 kb] [English Abstract]   (17985 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Anesthesiology and Pain
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseinnejad H, Razzaghi M. Comparison of central venous and peripheral venous pressures in the antecubital region in coronary arterial bypass graft surgery. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2013; 15 (1) :80-84
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-1690-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 1 (3-2013) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)