Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Omid Mozafari, Aioub Sofizadeh, Hamid Reza Shoraka, Javad Namrodi, Ehsan Allah Kalteh,
Volume 8, Issue 1 (3-2020)
Abstract

Background and objective: zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) is one of the most important health problems in Golestan Province, northeastern Iran. Several studies have investigated various aspects of the disease in this province. Herein, we provide a detailed review of the results of all studies related to leishmaniasis to give a reliable insight into the state of the disease in this province.
Material and Methods: The search for articles was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science without language restriction until the beginning of 2019.  Articles in Persian were retrieved from the Magiran, Scientific Information Database, and IranMedex. Overall, 41 articles were subjected to content analysis under the different themes.
Results: Counties of Gonbad-e-Kavus and Maraveh Tappeh are endemic areas of ZCL with an incidence rate 99.4-379.1 in 100000 population and has mesoendemic situation in these counties. Leishmania major is the dominant (99.1%) agent of leishmaniasis. Among 18 sandflies species detected in the province, Phlebotomus papatasi was the main vector of the disease with a mean infection rate of 9.2%. Peak of sandflies activity was recorded in the mid-July and mid-September. Rhombomys opimus and Meriones libycus were the main reservoirs of this disease with a mean infection rate of 25.3 and 31.8%. The density of sandflies and wild rodents were highest in the endemic areas for ZCL.
Conclusion: In Golestan Province, ZCL has been in a hypoendemic situation and in some areas in a mesoendemic situation and has increased significantly in recent years, so it is recommended to investigate the reasons for this increase.

Ali Khademi , Zeinolabedin Mohammadi , Farideh Tohidi ,
Volume 12, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Abstract

Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a parasitic infection that causes significant health problems. This study aimed to survey the prevalence of Leishmania and Crithidia spp. co-infection in the wounds of patients with suspected Leishmaniasis in Golestan Province, northern Iran.
Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included 140 smears of patients suspected of CL who were referred to the Leishmaniasis Diagnostic Laboratory in Aq-Qala Health Center, Golestan Province, northern Iran, in 2019–2020. The sore smears, along with demographic and epidemiological data of patients, were obtained from the laboratory archives. DNA was extracted from Giemsa-stained smears, and PCR was performed on the ITS1 and GPDH genes for Leishmania and Crithidia spp., respectively.
Results: In our research, 140 patients suspected of CL were studied. PCR results showed that 117 patients (83.5%) were positive for L. major, three patients (2.1%) were positive for L. tropica, and 20 patients (14.2%) were negative for the Leishmania parasite. One patient’s smear was positive for Crithidia species. Five patients (3.5%) had a history of treated leishmaniasis. The results indicated that 74.7% of the patients with one wound, 89.5% of the patients with two wounds, 96.4% of the patients with three wounds, 90.9% of the patients with four wounds, and 100% of the patients with five or more wounds were positive for L. major.
Conclusion: More studies should be conducted in the field of simultaneous infection of Leishmania and Crithidia in humans. In addition, research on the effect of leishmaniasis treatments on Crithidia spp. can be useful.


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Jorjani Biomedicine Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb