Volume 4, Issue 2 (10-2016)                   Jorjani Biomed J 2016, 4(2): 81-91 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Babazadeh T, Banaye Jeddi M, Shojaeizadeh D, Moradi F, Mirzaeian K, Gheysvandi E. Effect of educational intervention based on family-centered empowerment model in high risk behavior modification among patients with brucellosis. Jorjani Biomed J 2016; 4 (2) :81-91
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-477-en.html
1- PhD candidate in Health Education and Health Promotion, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2- MSc in Epidemiology, Department of Combating with Diseases, Chaldean Network of Health and Treatment, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
3- Professor of Health Education Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , shojaei5@yahoo.com
4- Senior Expert, Director of General Office of Health, Tehran Municipality, Tehran, Iran.
5- PhD candidate in Health Education and Health Promotion, school of public health, Hamedan University of medical sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
Abstract:   (12629 Views)

Background and Objectives: Family-centered empowerment model is one of the patterns in the area of empowering patients in modification of risky behaviors. According to extensive health and economic consequences of brucellosis in the community, we decided to evaluate the effect of this pattern in risk behavior modification in patients with brucellosis.

Methods: The current study was a quasi-experimental study that was performed on 76 individuals with brucellosis in Chalderan County, 2013. All of the patients were allocated in intervention and control groups using stratified randomiztion. Data was collected using a standardized researcher-made questionnaire based on family-centered empowerment model in five structures including knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, self-esteem and behavior in two phases. The first stage was before the educational intervention and the second stage was performed two months after the intervention. To analyze data statistically, descriptive statistics and paired and independent t tests with the significance level of 0.05 were used.

Results: Mean and standard deviation of the patients' ages was 37.9 ± 14.7. Paired t-test results showed that the mean scores of knowledge (p<0.001), attitudes (p<0.001), self efficacy (p<0.001), self-esteem (p<0.001) and behavior (p<0.001) were significantly increased within the intervention group. However, the changes were not significant in the mean scores of knowledge (p=0.293), attitudes (p=0.106), self efficacy (p=0.225), self-esteem (p=0.105) and behavior (p=0.303) in the control group. According to the results of independent t-test, the mean scores increased considerably in all structures within the intervention group in comparison to the control group after the educational intervention (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Regular interventional programs and applying educational theories could be an effective method  in high risk behavior modification in patients with brucellosis. Therefore, such  programs should be implemented in a wide range.

Full-Text [PDF 630 kb]   (2554 Downloads)    


Type of Article: Original article | Subject: General medicine
Received: 2016/12/26 | Accepted: 2016/12/26 | Published: 2016/12/26

References
1. Andriopoulos P, Tsironi M, Deftereos S, Aessopos S and Assimakopoulos S. Acute brucellosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of 144 cases. International journal of infectious diseases, 2007. 11(1): p. 52-57
2. Dobrean V, Opris A, and Daraban S. An epidemiological and surveillance overview of brucellosis in Romania. Veterinary microbiology, 2002. 90(1): p. 157-163
3. Shoraka HM, Hosseini H, Sofizadeh A, Avaznia A, Rajabzadeh R and Hwjazi A. Evaluate the epidemiology of brucellosis in the city Vsmlqan Manet, North Khorasan, Journal of north Khorasan, 2010, 2(2,3): 65-72. .[Persian]
4. Dean AS, Crump L, Grete H, Schelling E, Zinsstag J.
5. Almasi A, Khodayari M, Eshrati B and Shamsi M. The effective factors in the interval began diagnosis of brucellosis in Central, 2011, 4(6): 21-30.[Persian]
6. Moradi Gh, Kanani Sh, Majidpoor M and Ghaderi E. An epidemiological study of 3880 patients with brucellosis in Kurdistan, Journal of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Infectious Diseases Specialist Association 2006, 11(33): 27-33. [Persian]
7. Almasi A, Khodayari M, Eshrati B and Shamsi M. The effective factors in the interval began diagnosis of brucellosis in Central, 2011, 4(6): 21-30.[Persian]
8. Roushan, M.R, Baiania M, Asnafib N and Saedi F. Outcomes of 19 pregnant women with brucellosis in Babol, northern Iran. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2011. 105(9): p. 540-542
9. Olsen S. Brucellosis in the United States: Role and significance of wildlife reservoirs. Vaccine, 2010. 28: p. F73-F76
10. Al-Majali, A.M. and M. Shorman, Childhood brucellosis in Jordan: prevalence and analysis of risk factors. International journal of infectious diseases, 2009. 13(2): p. 196-200
11. Earhart K, Vafakolov S, Yarmohammadov N, Michel A, Tjiden and Soleiman A.Risk factors for brucellosis in Samarqand Oblast, Uzbekistan. International journal of infectious diseases, 2009. 13(6): p. 749-753
12. Taleski V,Zerva S, Kantardijiv T, Cvetnic Z, Erski-Biljic M, Nikoloskvi B, Katalinic- Jankovic v and et al. An overview of the epidemiology and epizootology of brucellosis in selected countries of Central and Southeast Europe. Veterinary microbiology, 2002. 90(1): p. 147-15511
13. Al Dahouk S, Neubauer H, Hensel A, Schöneberg I, Nöckler K, Alpers K et al., Changing epidemiology of human brucellosis, Germany, 1962–2005. Emerging infectious diseases, 2007. 13(12): p. 1895
14. Farahani S, Shah Mohamadi S, Navidi I, Sofian M. An investigation of the epidemiology of brucellosis in Arak City, Iran, (2001-2010). Arak University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2012; 14 (7) :49-54
15. Omar S, Alieldin NHM, Knatib OMN. Cancer magnitude, Challenges and Control in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Health Journal 2007; 13(6):1486-99
16. Sharifirad G, Entezari MH, Kamran A, Azadbakht L. The effectiveness of nutritional education on the knowledge of diabetic patients using the health belief model. J of res in med scie: the official j of Isfahan Uni of Med Sci. 2009; 14(1):1
17. Masoodi R, Alhani F, Moghadassi J and Ghorbani M. The effect of family-centered empowerment model on skill, attitude , and knowledge of multiple sclerosis caregivers, 2010, 17(2): 87-97.[Persian]
18. A Allahyari, F Alhany, A Kazemnejad and Izadyar MD. The effect of family-centered empowerment model on the Quality of Life of school-age B-thalassemia children, Journal of Pediatrics, 2006, 16(4):455-461.[Persian]
19. Ghotbi T, Seyed Bagher Maddah S, Dalvandi A, Arsalani N, Farzi M. The effect of education of self care behaviors based on family-centered empowerment model in type II diabetes. Journal of Shahid Beheshti School of Nursing and Midwifery, 2013; 23(83): 43-50.[persian]
20. Vahedian Azimi A, Alhani F, Ahmadi F and Kazemnejad A. Effect of family-centered empowerment model on the life style of myocardial infarction patients. Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 2009, 2(4): 127-132. [Persian]
21. Alhani F. Evaluating of family center empowerment model on preventing iron deficiency anemia. [PhD Dissertation]. Iran. Tehran. Faculty of Medical Science. Tarbiat Modares University. 2003. [Persian]
22. Rajabi R , Sabzevari S, Borhani F, Haghdoost AA and Bazargan N. The effect of family-centered Empowerment Model on quality of life school age children with asthma, 2013, 2(4): 7-15.[Persian].
23. Oruoji MA, Hashemi SI, Hazavehei MM, Charkazi A, Jvaheri J and Moazeni M. The Positive Impact of Educational Intervention Program Based on Precede Model on Preventive Behaviors to Reduce Brucellosis in the Rural People of Khomein, 2012, 9(1): 51-60
24. Anderson RM, Funnel MM. Using the Empowerment Approach to Help Patients Change Behavior. In: Anderson BJ, Rubin RR, American Diabetes Association, Editors. Practical Psychology for Diabetes Clinicians. 2 nd ed. Texas: American Diabetes Association; 2003. p. 3-12
25. Rodríguez C, Heredia OR, Fernández MM , González GG. Educational intervention to elevate the level of knowledge on brucellosis in workers exposed to risk: Camagüey municipality, AMC 2009; 13(3):1-12
26. Karimy M, Montazeri A and Araban M. The effect of an educational program based on health belief model on the empowerment of rural women in prevention of brucellosis, 2012, 14(4): 85-94. [Persian]
27. Liu XL, Zhou YB, Liu XG. Knowledge, attitude and behaviors on brucellosis among occupational groups in western Liaoning province. Chinese Journal of Public Health 2009; 25(12): 1475-6
28. JIN F, MA TB, HU XZ. The evaluation of intervention effect of Brucellosis in Hongsipu. Ningxia Medical Journal. 2012;34(7):626-9
29. Gholami S, Mohammadi E, Pourashraf Y, Sayehmiri K. Evaluating the predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption behavior in Ilam based on constructs of developed planned behavior theory. J Neyshabur Univ Med Sci. 2014; 2 (4) :8-18
30. Babaei V, Babazadeh T, Kiani A, Garmaroodi G, Batebi A. The Role of Effective Factors in Preventive Behaviors of Brucellosis in Stockbreeder of Charaoymaq County: A Health Belief Model. JFUMS. 2016; 5 (4) :470-478.[Persian]
31. Masoudi Gh, Shahnavazi M, Ansari A, Raeisy D, Varnamkhasti Khashei F. Determining the behavioral predictors of brucellosis in ranchers based on Health Belief Model. The 2nd International & the 6th National Iranian Congress of Brucellosis, 11-13 November 2015. [Persian]
32. Babaei V, Garmaroodi G, Batebi A, Alipour D, Shahbaz M, Babazadeh T. The Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention Based on the Health Belief Model in the Empowerment of Stockbreeders Against High-Risk Behaviors Associated with Brucellosis. Journal of Education and Community Health. 2014; 1 (3) :12-19. [Persian]
33. hassanpour M, delshad A, alemi A. Effect of an Educational Intervention Based on Empowerment Model on Awareness, Attitudes, Self-esteem and Self-efficacy of Men in Preventing Prostate Cancer. PCNM. 2014; 4 (1) :9-18. [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


User comments
Comment sent by Your Name or Email on 2018/07/9
elhamsaber6616@yahoo.com

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Jorjani Biomedicine Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb