[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Indexing Databases::
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 27, Issue 2 (7-2025) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2025, 27(2): 70-82 Back to browse issues page
Synergistic Effects of Carvacrol and Thymol on Docetaxel-Induced Cytotoxicity in the A549 Cell Line by Evaluating Cell Viability and Oxidative Stress
Mohammad Shokrzadeh1 , Mahboube Rahmati Kukandeh2 , Mohammad Karami3 , Samane Sadat Besharat *4
1- Professor, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Hemoglobinopathy Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
2- Ph.D Candidate in Toxicology, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
3- Professor, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
4- Pharmacy Student, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. , samanbst39@gmail.com
Keywords: Docetaxel [MeSH], Carvacrol [MeSH], Thymol [MeSH], Oxidative Stress [MeSH], Lipid Peroxidation [MeSH]
Article ID: Vol27-18
Full-Text [PDF 1094 kb]   (2786 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2240 Views)
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Pharmacology
Abstract:   (249 Views)
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Lung cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosis by gender, following prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women.
The two main pathological subtypes of lung cancer are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). SCLC is an aggressive disease with distinct pathological, clinical, and molecular characteristics, differentiating it from NSCLC. It has a high metastatic potential, which leads to a poor clinical prognosis. NSCLC accounts for the majority of lung cancer cases. Depending on the stage of the cancer, patients are eligible for specific treatments ranging from surgery to radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Various classes of drugs have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of lung cancer. Among the most common is docetaxel (DTX), a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of various cancers, including NSCLC. DTX, an anticancer drug belonging to the taxane family, is a semi-synthetic agent that irreversibly binds to β-actin, thereby altering microtubule polymerization, disrupting cell mitosis, and inducing apoptosis. Chemotherapeutic agents, including taxanes, are associated with severe complications, such as renal and neurotoxicity. DTX has been utilized for a long time in the treatment of several cancer types, including glioblastoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. However, this drug exhibits numerous adverse effects on normal tissues, such as the brain and testes. Severe complications, such as bone marrow suppression, alopecia, anaphylaxis, gastrointestinal reactions, weakness, edema, and liver dysfunction, may occur following DTX administration. Limitations, including a high recurrence rate and adverse effects like immune system damage and gastrointestinal tract injury, necessitate the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies for lung cancer. Several studies indicate that DTX-induced toxicity is caused by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). There is also evidence suggesting that inflammation and apoptosis may play crucial roles in DTX-induced tissue toxicity. Therefore, there is a continuous search for materials that can be used to create more effective cancer treatments with fewer complications. One promising group of materials comprises natural products. Many medicinal plants have scientifically proven therapeutic properties.
Phenolic compounds are a widely studied group of compounds known for their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Thymol (2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol) is a major phenolic compound found in the essential oil of various plants, including Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae). Numerous biological properties have been reported for thymol, including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antispasmodic, wound-healing, and antioxidant effects. It is also an active compound for inhibiting cancer cells. Thymol is a major phenolic compound present in the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris. Carvacrol is a naturally bioactive monoterpenoid phenol found in the essential oils of the Lamiaceae family, including the genera Origanum and Thymus. Previous studies have shown that carvacrol possesses anti-angiogenic, analgesic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. Furthermore, carvacrol exerts antiproliferative effects on liver, lung, colon, and breast cancer cell lines. These two compounds also demonstrate antifungal, insecticidal, antiviral, antitumor, antiparasitic, free radical scavenging, and lipid antiperoxidative activities. These characteristics form the basis for their widespread use in the cosmetic, food, and pharmaceutical industries.
Research reveals that carvacrol can elevate the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione (GSH). Studies have also confirmed that thymol, when its concentration is increased, exhibits significant antioxidant potential. It effectively blocks the excessive production of ROS, inhibits lipid peroxidation (LPO), and prevents the loss of membrane integrity. Given the established antioxidant and protective effects of carvacrol and thymol, and their ability to inhibit free radicals, this study was conducted to determine the synergistic effects of carvacrol and thymol on DTX-induced cytotoxicity in A549 cell line by evaluating cell viability and oxidative stress. This was achieved by evaluating cell viability and oxidative stress.
Methods
This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on the A549 lung cancer cell line (derived from lung cancerous tissue) at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.
Cellular Culture: In this study, A549 cell lines were purchased from the National Genetic Resources Cell Bank. The cell lines were cultured in the Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Biowest, France) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotic. Cells were maintained in an incubator at 37°C with adequate humidity and 5% carbon dioxide. For various experiments, when cell confluence reached at least 70-80%, cells were detached from the flask bottom using trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), without any shaking or tapping of the flask, and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of culture medium, and the viability percentage of cells in the cell suspension was determined by mixing equal parts of trypan blue and counting with a hemocytometer under a light microscope. After confirming the absence of cell contamination, cells with a viability percentage greater than 80-90% were used for the test.
Study Design: In the initial step, DTX was used as a cytotoxic model and applied to A549 cells across a concentration range of 0-70 µg/mL, increasing from low to high concentrations in order to determine the optimal cytotoxic concentration of DTX for oxidative stress assays (ROS and LPO) and to establish its inhibitory concentration (IC50) on the studied cell line. Subsequently, after determining the optimal cytotoxic concentration of DTX, the protective effects of carvacrol and thymol were investigated in seven groups with varying concentrations (5-200 µg/mL) alongside DTX at its IC50 concentration in all tests, using a pre-treatment approach.
Grouping was performed as follows:
- The negative control group (consisting of A549 cells + DMEM culture medium)
- The positive control group (consisting of DTX at its IC50 concentration)
- Treatment groups (consisting of 7 concentrations of carvacrol [5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL] combined with DTX at its IC50 concentration)
- Treatment groups (consisting of 7 concentrations of thymol ([5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL] combined with DTX at its IC50 concentration)
- The synergistic effective concentration (consisting of 7 concentrations of thymol and carvacrol [5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL] combined with DTX at its IC50 concentration).
Cytotoxicity Assessment: This was performed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.
Reactive Oxygen Species Level Measurement: Cells were treated with DTX alone and as a pre-treatment with thymol and carvacrol, and then examined.
Lipid Peroxidation Level Measurement: Following cell incubation, LPO levels were measured using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay.
Results
Determination of Docetaxel IC50 Value: DTX, a cytotoxic drug, was used to treat A549 cells across a concentration range of 0-70 µg/mL (from low to high concentrations) to determine the inhibitory concentration (IC50) of DTX on the studied cell line. The IC50 value for A549 cells when treated with DTX was determined to be 8.92 µg/mL.
The Effect of Carvacrol on Cell Function in Docetaxel-Treated A549 Cells: According to the results obtained from the MTT assay, the cell function and viability in DTX-treated cells showed a significant decrease, which was statistically significant compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Carvacrol, at concentrations of 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL, culminated in improved cell function and increased viability in DTX-treated cells. This improvement was statistically significant compared to the DTX-only group (P < 0.01 for 10 µg/mL and P < 0.001 for 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL). However, carvacrol at a concentration of 5 µg/mL did not significantly affect cell function improvement or viability increase in DTX-treated cells.
The Effect of Thymol on Cell Function in Docetaxel-Treated A549 Cells: Thymol, at concentrations of 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL, improved cell function and increased viability in DTX-treated A549 cells compared to the DTX-alone group (P < 0.01 for 20 µg/mL and P < 0.001 for 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL), showing a significant difference. At concentrations of 5 and 10 µg/mL, thymol did not show any significant effect on improving cell function or increasing viability in DTX-treated cells.
The Simultaneous Effects of Carvacrol and Thymol on Cell Function in Docetaxel-Treated A549 Cells: Carvacrol and thymol, at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL, led to an improvement in cell function and viability in DTX-treated A549 cells. This improvement was significantly different compared to the DTX-only group (P < 0.01 for 5 µg/mL, and P < 0.001 for 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL).
The Effects of Carvacrol and Thymol on Reactive Oxygen Species Formation in Docetaxel-Treated A549 Cells: ROS formation was investigated in DTX-treated A549 cells and varying concentrations of carvacrol and thymol after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. DTX, at a concentration of 8.92 µg/mL, significantly increased ROS levels in normal cells, showing a statistically significant difference compared to the control group (P < 0.001). However, carvacrol and thymol, at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 μg/mL, significantly reduced ROS formation and oxidative damage in treated cells. This reduction was notably different when compared to the DTX-treated groups (P < 0.01 for 5 μg/mL and P < 0.001 for 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 μg/mL concentrations). Moreover, carvacrol and thymol, at concentrations of 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL, significantly reduced ROS formation and oxidative damage in the treated cells, with this reduction being statistically significant when compared to the control group (P < 0.01 for 5 µg/mL and P < 0.001 for 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL).
The Effects of Carvacrol and Thymol on Lipid Peroxidation Levels in Docetaxel-Treated A549 Cells: A significant increase in LPO levels was observed in DTX-treated cells so that LPO levels in the DTX-treated groups were significantly different compared to the control group (P < 0.001). In carvacrol- and thymol-treated cells, at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL, the LPO levels were significantly reduced compared to the DTX-treated groups (P < 0.01 for 5 µg/mL and P<0.001 for 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL concentrations).
Conclusion
Based on the findings of our study, DTX significantly increased markers of oxidative stress (ROS) and LPO (malondialdehyde [MDA]), while decreased viability compared to the control group. In contrast, treatment with carvacrol at concentrations of 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL culminated in improved cell function and increased viability in DTX-treated cells, showing a significant difference when compared to the DTX-only group. However, at a concentration of 5 µg/mL of carvacrol, no significant change was observed in viability of treated cells. Regarding thymol, concentrations of 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL led to improved cell function and increased viability in DTX-treated cells, showing a significant difference compared to the DTX-only group. Conversely, regarding carvacrol, at concentrations of 5 and 10 µg/mL, no statistically significant change was observed in the viability of treated cells. Simultaneous incubation with carvacrol and thymol at concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100, and 200 µg/mL significantly improved cell viability and reduced oxidative stress changes in A549 cells compared to the DTX-treated groups.
Given that the current study was conducted on A549 cells, higher concentrations of thymol and carvacrol were effective in reducing oxidative stress. A greater reduction in oxidative stress was also observed commensurate with increasing concentrations of these compounds. In the present study, thymol and carvacrol exhibited similar therapeutic effects on DTX-treated A549 cells, while carvacrol did not demonstrate significant antioxidant effects at low concentrations. It reduced ROS and LPO at higher concentrations.
Ethical Statement
The study received approval from the Research Ethics Committee at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR.MAZUMS.REC.1402.375).
Funding
This article has been extracted from doctoral dissertation of Ms. Samaneh Sadat Besharat in Pharmacy from the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. This study was funded by the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.
Authors' Contributions
Mohammad Shokrzadeh: Project administration and design and approval of the final manuscript.
Mahboube Rahmati Kukandeh: Data analysis and interpretation of the results.
Mohammad Karami: Project administration and design.
Samane Sadat Besharat: Project execution, data collection, and drafting of the initial manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest.
Key Message: Carvacrol and thymol are effective as high-potential compounds in improving cell function and reducing DTX-induced cytotoxicity in A549 cancer cells.
 
References
1. de Groot PM, Wu CC, Carter BW, Munden RF. The epidemiology of lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018 Jun;7(3):220-33. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2018.05.06. [DOI] [PubMed]
2. Howlader N, Forjaz G, Mooradian MJ, Meza R, Kong CY, Cronin KA, et al. The Effect of Advances in Lung-Cancer Treatment on Population Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug;383(7):640-49. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1916623. [DOI] [PubMed]
3. Wang S, Zimmermann S, Parikh K, Mansfield AS, Adjei AA. Current Diagnosis and Management of Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Aug;94(8):1599-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed]
4. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016 Jun;5(3):288-300. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Razak SA, Mohd Gazzali A, Fisol FA, M Abdulbaqi I, Parumasivam T, Mohtar N, et al. Advances in Nanocarriers for Effective Delivery of Docetaxel in the Treatment of Lung Cancer: An Overview. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 22;13(3):400. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030400. [DOI] [PubMed]
6. Thambiraj S, Shruthi S, Vijayalakshmi R, Ravi Shankaran D. Evaluation of cytotoxic activity of docetaxel loaded gold nanoparticles for lung cancer drug delivery. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2019;21:100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2019.100157. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Baş E, Naziroğlu M. Selenium attenuates docetaxel-induced apoptosis and mitochondrial oxidative stress in kidney cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2019 Apr;30(4):339-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/cad.0000000000000723. [DOI] [PubMed]
8. Li T, Baochen Z, Yue Z, Cheng W, Yali W, Zongxi S, et al. Network Pharmacology-Based identification of pharmacological mechanism of SQFZ injection in combination with Docetaxel on lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2019 Mar;9(1):4533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40954-3. [DOI] [PubMed]
9. Bao Y, Deng Q, Li Y, Zhou S. Engineering docetaxel-loaded micelles for non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study of microfluidic and bulk nanoparticle preparation. RSC Adv. 2018 Sep;8(56):31950-66. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra04512g. [DOI] [PubMed]
10. Ataizi ZS, Ertilav K, Nazıroğlu M. Mitochondrial oxidative stress-induced brain and hippocampus apoptosis decrease through modulation of caspase activity, Ca2+ influx and inflammatory cytokine molecular pathways in the docetaxel-treated mice by melatonin and selenium treatments. Metab Brain Dis. 2019 Aug;34(4):1077-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-019-00428-x. [DOI] [PubMed]
11. Yardım A, Kucukler S, Özdemir S, Çomaklı S, Caglayan C, Kandemir FM, Çelik H. Silymarin alleviates docetaxel-induced central and peripheral neurotoxicity by reducing oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis in rats. Gene. 2021 Feb;769:145239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.145239. [DOI] [PubMed]
12. Sampaio LA, Pina LTS, Serafini MR, Tavares DDS, Guimarães AG. Antitumor Effects of Carvacrol and Thymol: A Systematic Review. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;12:702487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.702487. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Nagarajan S, Nagarajan R, Kumar J, Salemme A, Togna AR, Saso L, et al. Antioxidant Activity of Synthetic Polymers of Phenolic Compounds. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Jul;12(8):1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081646. [DOI] [PubMed]
14. Gutiérrez-Larraínzar M, Rúa J, Caro I, de Castro C, de Arriaga D, García-Armesto MR, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of natural phenolic compounds against foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria. Food Control. 2012;26(2):555-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.025. [Link] [DOI]
15. Kang SH, Kim YS, Kim EK, Hwang JW, Jeong JH, Dong X, et al. Anticancer Effect of Thymol on AGS Human Gastric Carcinoma Cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jan;26(1):28-37. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1506.06073. [DOI] [PubMed]
16. Nagoor Meeran MF, Javed H, Al Taee H, Azimullah S, Ojha SK. Pharmacological Properties and Molecular Mechanisms of Thymol: Prospects for Its Therapeutic Potential and Pharmaceutical Development. Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;8:380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00380. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. Arab H, Fathi M, Mortezai E, Hosseinimehr S J. Chemoprotective effect of thymol against genotoxicity induced by bleomycin in human lymphocytes. Pharm Biomed Res. 2015;1(1):26-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.pbr.1.1.26. [Link] [DOI]
18. Lee KP, Kim JE, Park WH, Hong H. Regulation of C6 glioma cell migration by thymol. Oncol Lett. 2016 Apr;11(4):2619-24. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4237. [DOI] [PubMed]
19. Elbe H, Yigitturk G, Cavusoglu T, Baygar T, Ozgul Onal M, Ozturk F. Comparison of ultrastructural changes and the anticarcinogenic effects of thymol and carvacrol on ovarian cancer cells: which is more effective? Ultrastruct Pathol. 2020 Mar;44(2):193-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01913123.2020.1740366. [DOI] [PubMed]
20. Ramos M, Jiménez A, Peltzer M, Garrigós MC. Characterization and antimicrobial activity studies of polypropylene films with carvacrol and thymol for active packaging. J Food Eng. 2012;109(3):513-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.031. [Link] [DOI]
21. Beena, Kumar D, Rawat DS. Synthesis and antioxidant activity of thymol and carvacrol based Schiff bases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013 Feb;23(3):641-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed]
22. Naghdi Badi H, Abdollahi M, Mehrafarin A, Ghorbanpour M, Tolyat S, Qaderi A, et al. [An Overview on Two Valuable Natural and Bioactive Compounds, Thymol and Carvacrol, in Medicinal Plants]. J. Med. Plants. 2017;16(63):1-32. [Article in Persian] [Link]
23. Ramos M, Beltrán A, Peltzer M, Valente AJ, del Carmen Garrigós M. Release and antioxidant activity of carvacrol and thymol from polypropylene active packaging films. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2014;58(2):470-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.04.019. [Link] [DOI]
24. Ye X, Ling T, Xue Y, Xu C, Zhou W, Hu L, et al. Thymol Mitigates Cadmium Stress by Regulating Glutathione Levels and Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis in Tobacco Seedlings. Molecules. 2016 Oct;21(10):1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101339. [DOI] [PubMed]
25. Balan DJ, Rajavel T, Das M, Sathya S, Jeyakumar M, Devi KP. Thymol induces mitochondrial pathway-mediated apoptosis via ROS generation, macromolecular damage and SOD diminution in A549 cells. Pharmacol Rep. 2021 Feb;73(1):240-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-020-00171-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
26. Ghassemi-Barghi N, Varshosaz J, Etebari M, Jafarian Dehkordi A. Role of recombinant human erythropoietin loading chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles in busulfan-induced genotoxicity: Analysis of DNA fragmentation via comet assay in cultured HepG2 cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016 Oct;36:46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed]
27. Ajdary H, Safaei S, Hashemzadeh S, Kazemi T, Shanehbandi D, Baghbanzadeh A, et al. Chemotherapeutic Agents Increase PD-L1 Expression in A549 Lung Cancer Cell Line. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-573138/v1. Preprint. [Link] [DOI]
28. Khosravifarsani M, Tolouian R, Yadollahifarsani S, Soleimani P, Sarazen M, Mostafizi P, et al. Medical plants for lung cancer: an overview of current knowledge. Immunopathol Persa. 2023;9(1):e38455. https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2022.38455. [Link] [DOI]
29. Ozkan A, Erdogan A. A comparative study of the antioxidant/prooxidant effects of carvacrol and thymol at various concentrations on membrane and DNA of parental and drug resistant H1299 cells. Nat Prod Commun. 2012 Dec;7(12):1557-60. [PubMed]
30. Jafari A, Karimipour M, Khaksar MR, Ghasemnejad-Berenji M. Protective effects of orally administered thymol against titanium dioxide nanoparticle-induced testicular damage. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jan;27(2):2353-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06937-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
31. Amara I, Timoumi R, Annabi E, Ben Othmène Y, Abid-Essefi S. The protective effects of thymol and carvacrol against di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-induced cytotoxicity in HEK-293 cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2022 Aug;36(8):e23092. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.23092. [DOI] [PubMed]
32. Rúa J, Del Valle P, de Arriaga D, Fernández-Álvarez L, García-Armesto MR. Combination of Carvacrol and Thymol: Antimicrobial Activity Against Staphylococcus aureus and Antioxidant Activity. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019 Sep;16(9):622-29. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2018.2594. [DOI] [PubMed]
33. Güvenç M, Cellat M, Gökçek İ, Yavaş İ, Yurdagül Özsoy Ş. Effects of thymol and carvacrol on sperm quality and oxidant/antioxidant balance in rats. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2019 Dec;125(5):396-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13813455.2018.1476979. [DOI] [PubMed]
34. El-Sayed el-SM, Mansour AM, Abdul-Hameed MS. Thymol and Carvacrol Prevent Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity by Abrogation of Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Apoptosis in Rats. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2016 Jan;30(1):37-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.21740. [DOI] [PubMed]
35. Shahrokhi Raeini A, Hafizibarjin Z, Rezvani ME, Safari F, Afkhami Aghda F, Zare Mehrjerdi F. Carvacrol suppresses learning and memory dysfunction and hippocampal damages caused by chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;393(4):581-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-019-01754-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
36. Chen Y, Ba L, Huang W, Liu Y, Pan H, Mingyao E, et al. Role of carvacrol in cardioprotection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats through activation of MAPK/ERK and Akt/eNOS signaling pathways. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;796:90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.11.053. [DOI] [PubMed]
37. Khazdair MR, Alavinezhad A, Boskabady MH. Carvacrol ameliorates haematological parameters, oxidant/antioxidant biomarkers and pulmonary function tests in patients with sulphur mustard-induced lung disorders: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Oct;43(5):664-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12684. [DOI] [PubMed]
38. Palabiyik SS, Karakus E, Halici Z, Cadirci E, Bayir Y, Ayaz G, et al. The protective effects of carvacrol and thymol against paracetamol-induced toxicity on human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2). Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016 Dec;35(12):1252-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327115627688. [DOI] [PubMed]
39. Hassan HFH, Mansour AM, Salama SA, El-Sayed EM. The chemopreventive effect of thymol against dimethylhydrazine and/or high fat diet-induced colon cancer in rats: Relevance to NF-κB. Life Sci. 2021 Jun;274:119335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119335. [DOI] [PubMed]
40. Aydın E, Türkez H, Keleş MS. The effect of carvacrol on healthy neurons and N2a cancer cells: some biochemical, anticancerogenicity and genotoxicity studies. Cytotechnology. 2014 Jan;66(1):149-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-013-9547-5. [DOI] [PubMed]
41. Bayir AG, Kiziltan HS, Kocyigit A. Plant family, carvacrol, and putative protection in gastric cancer: Foods, Nutrients, and Dietary Supplements. Dietary Interventions in Gastrointestinal Diseases. Academic Press. 2019; pp:3-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814468-8.00001-6. [Link] [DOI]
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shokrzadeh M, Rahmati Kukandeh M, Karami M, Besharat S S. Synergistic Effects of Carvacrol and Thymol on Docetaxel-Induced Cytotoxicity in the A549 Cell Line by Evaluating Cell Viability and Oxidative Stress. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2025; 27 (2) :70-82
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-4510-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 2 (7-2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.18 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)