---

Background&Objective: To assess the effect of a lateral – wedge insole with subtalar supporting on the femorotibial angle in patients with varus defomrity of the knee. Materials&Methods: The efficacy of a wedged insole with subtalar supporting and that of traditional wedge insole shoe insert were compared. 20 outpatient with knee osteoarthritist were randomized to be treated with either the supported or traditional inserted insole. In both group , the baseline and 2 month koos scores for subjective knee pain and ADL and quality of live and symptoms were compared. Results: At the baseline , there were no significant difference in the femorotibial angle and pain and ADL, quality of life and symptoms, the 10 subjects wearing the subtalar supporting demonstrated a significatly increase femoretibial angle and koos scores without pain compared with insole group, there were no significant difference between twe group in pain after treatment. Conclusion: These results suggest that an insole with a subtalar supporting maintained the valgus correction of the, femoretibial angle in patgle in patients with varus knee OA for 2 months.

---

Background and Objective: Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease and associated with degeneration of the joint cartilage. Its high prevalence, particulary in the elderly, and the high rate of disability related to disease make it a leading cause of disability. The symptoms of osteoarthritis are pain, morning stiffness and joint limited motion. This study was carired out to compare the effects of physical modalities and home based exercise training on symptoms and function of knee osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study, fourty patients with knee osteoarthritis according to the American college of rheumatology (ACR) criteria randomly divided into two treatment groups. The physical modality group (A) received TENS, US and Hot pack at pain areas. The exercise group (B) received isometric exercise of the knee. Each group received 3 treatment sessions per week for 4 weeks. Evaluating measuring tools were pain intensity (based on Visual Analogue Scale: VAS) and function was measured with koos questionnare. Results: Improvement in pain, quality of life, symptoms, sports and reduction, in pain intensity on VAS in the physical modality group after treatment were seen (P<0.05). Also significant improvement in symptoms and quality of life observed in the exercise group. Improvement in activity of daily life found in the physical modality group in comparison with exercise group (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that physical modality and exercise training reduce pain and improve quality of life, activity of daily life and sport in patients with the same rate. While activity of daily life improve more in physical modality method.