[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Indexing Databases::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 26, Issue 2 (Summer 2024) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2024, 26(2): 37-46 Back to browse issues page
Relationship between Dental Caries Index and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Hossein Khodabakhshi1 , Sudabeh Bagheri Moghaddam2 , Masoud Mohammadi*3 , Nazanin Mortazavi * 4
1- Dentist, Dental Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Dental Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor of Medical Librarianship and Information Sciences, Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. mohammadi.msd84@gmail.com
4- Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Dental Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. , mortazavi_nazanin@yahoo.com
Keywords: DMF Index [MeSH], Oral Health [MeSH], Quality of Life [MeSH]
Article ID: Vol26-15
Full-Text [PDF 721 kb]   (4121 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1443 Views)
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Health System
Abstract:   (169 Views)

Extended Abstract

Introduction
Dental caries is an infectious disease caused by acid-producing bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli. Various sociodemographic factors can influence dental caries; thus, calculating a valid dental caries index, known in dentistry as the DMFT (Decay, Missing, Filling Teeth) Index, can provide a comprehensive overview of an individual's and the community's dental health. The appearance of teeth, a beautiful smile, and their role in social interactions, absence of pain in the jaw and teeth, comfort in the mouth, and ease and pleasure in eating and speaking can all be affected by dental caries, reducing overall life satisfaction and quality of life. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the DMFT index and oral health-related quality of life.
Methods
This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 61 patients (29 men and 32 women) aged 20-50 years, selected through convenience sampling. A specialist in oral, maxillofacial, and dental diseases performed oral examinations. Participants were divided into three age groups: 20-29 years, 30-39 years, and 40-50 years. The DMFT index, including decay (D), missing (M), and filled (F) teeth, was determined for each subject. The DIDL (Dental Impact on Daily Living) questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. This 36-question survey evaluates five domains: appearance and aesthetics, oral comfort, general oral and dental function, eating restrictions, and tooth and jaw pain. Participants were asked to carefully complete the DIDL questionnaire after receiving the necessary explanations. The DIDL questionnaire was completed under the supervision of a specialist in oral and dental diseases. Scores were recorded based on positive (+1), neutral (0), and negative (-1) responses, with a total score range from -10 to 10. The DIDL responses were then categorized into three groups: dissatisfied (scores below 0), moderately satisfied (scores 0-7), and satisfied (scores above 7).
Results
The mean and standard deviation of the oral health-related quality of life score for the entire study population was 5.14±0.229. The overall satisfaction percentages based on the DIDL questionnaire were 31.14% dissatisfied, 57.37% moderately satisfied, and 11.47% satisfied. Patients satisfaction rate was 63.93%, 52.45%,45.90% ,45.90and39.43%  in the oral comfort domain, overall oral and dental function, eating limitations, (45.90), appearance and aesthetics and dental and jaw pain , respectively.
The mean and standard deviation of the DMFT index with ranges of 0-28 was 9.36±5.14, with the most frequent values being 7, 11, and 13, each comprising 11.5% of the sample. The mean and standard deviation for decay (D) with ranges of 0-12 was 3.44±3.15, for missing teeth (M) with ranges of 0-19 was 2.92±1.98, and for filled teeth (F) was 3.93±3.63.
A significant inverse moderate relationship was found between the DMFT index and oral health-related quality of life (P=0.005, Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.358). There was a significant difference in the mean DMFT index among dissatisfied, moderately satisfied, and satisfied individuals in the domains of appearance and aesthetics, oral comfort, and eating restrictions. Still, no significant differences were found in the general function and pain domains. The mean DMFT index was lower among those satisfied with their quality of life compared to those moderately happy and dissatisfied. Additionally, the mean DMFT index significantly differed among the three satisfaction groups across all five domains (P<0.05).
Conclusion
According to the results of this study, there is a moderate, inverse, and significant relationship between the DMFT index and oral health-related quality of life. In other words, as the total caries index (sum of decayed, missing, and filled teeth) increases, the quality of life (level of satisfaction) decreases. The correlation analysis indicated that men are more affected by oral and dental problems than women, which might be due to more accurate reporting of life quality by men or underreporting by women due to sample size limitations. However, the regression approach identified gender as a significant predictor.
The most significant impact of the DMFT index was observed in the 30-40 age group. This can be explained by the increasing overall effects of the DMFT index on quality of life with age. Still, in the 30-40 age group, the impact is more pronounced due to broader social interactions in professional, educational, and familial settings, as they constitute a segment of the younger workforce. Appearance, a satisfying smile, and the absence of pain and psychological discomfort are crucial criteria that can profoundly affect the quality of life in this age range.
In this study, the effect of the DMFT index decreased with higher education levels. In other words, with higher education and consequently better socioeconomic status, individuals place more importance on oral health and dental care access, reducing the DMFT index and improving quality of life. Tooth decay and loss had negative effects on quality of life, with tooth loss having a more significant impact than decay. However, an interesting point is the direct relationship between filled teeth and quality of life observed in this study. Well-restored teeth without clinical signs such as pain can function similarly to healthy teeth, fulfilling their roles in aesthetics, chewing, and speech.
The mean DMFT index was lower among those who were satisfied with their quality of life than among those who were moderately happy and dissatisfied.
Ethical Statement
The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR.GOUMS.REC.1398.052).
Funding
This article is based on Hossein Khodabakhshi's thesis for obtaining a professional doctorate in dentistry from the Faculty of Dentistry, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgement
We extend our gratitude to the study participants for their cooperation.

Key Message
An increase in the dental caries index decreases oral health-related quality of life. Appearance and aesthetics, oral comfort, and eating restrictions are crucial factors impacting quality of life and life satisfaction.

References
1. Kumar S, Kumar A, Badiyani B, Kumar A, Basak D, Ismail MB. Oral health impact, dental caries experience, and associated factors in 12-15-year-old school children in India. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2017 Apr;29(2):20150041. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2015-0041. [DOI] [PubMed]
2. Friedman PK, Kaufman LB, Karpas SL. Oral health disparity in older adults: dental decay and tooth loss. Dent Clin North Am. 2014 Oct;58(4):757-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed]
3. Heng C. Tooth Decay Is the Most Prevalent Disease. Fed Pract. 2016 Oct;33(10):31-33. [PubMed]
4. Hybels CF, Wu B, Landerman LR, Liang J, Bennett JM, Plassman BL. Trends in decayed teeth among middle-aged and older adults in the United States: socioeconomic disparities persist over time. J Public Health Dent. 2016 Sep;76(4):287-94. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12153. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Moradi G, Mohamadi Bolbanabad A, Moinafshar A, Adabi H, Sharafi M, Zareie B. Evaluation of Oral Health Status Based on the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) Index. Iran J Public Health. 2019 Nov;48(11):2050-57. [PubMed]
6. Bashirian S, Shirahmadi S, Seyedzadeh-Sabounchi S, Soltanian AR, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Vahdatinia F. Association of caries experience and dental plaque with sociodemographic characteristics in elementary school-aged children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jan;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0464-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Kedia D, Jha G, Desai O, Jain S, Deshmukh V. Psychological Effects of Missing Maxillary Anterior Teeth on Daily Life. Journal of Psychology and Political Science (JPPS). 2023;3(03):36-45. doi: 10.55529/jpps.33.36.45. [Link] [DOI]
8. Newton JT, Subramanian SS, Westland S, Gupta AK, Luo W, Joiner A. The impact of tooth colour on the perceptions of age and social judgements. J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103771. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103771. [DOI] [PubMed]
9. Ramos-Jorge J, Alencar BM, Pordeus IA, Soares ME, Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, et al. Impact of dental caries on quality of life among preschool children: emphasis on the type of tooth and stages of progression. Eur J Oral Sci. 2015 Apr;123(2):88-95. doi: 10.1111/eos.12166. [DOI] [PubMed]
10. Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jul;34(7):645-49. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
11. Fallowfield L. What is quality of life? Health Economics. 2009; 1(8):1-8. [Link]
12. Deepan Kumar CV, Mohamed S, Janakiram C, Joseph J. Validation of dental impact on daily living questionnaire among tribal population of India. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Sep;6(Suppl 1):S235-41. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.166841. [DOI] [PubMed]
13. Khadem P, Jabarifar SE, Maroofi V, Ghasemi D, Mohammad Taher V. [The Relationship between Oral and dental health and quality of life based on DIDL index]. J Res Dent Sci. 2011;7(4):41-35. [Article in Persian] [Link]
14. Khan SDAA, Alqannass NM, Alwadei MM, Alnajrani MD, Alshahrani ZM, Al Alhareth AY, et al. Assessment of the Relationship between Dental Anxiety and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S359-S362. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_742_20. [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Tabesh A, Sadat Abtahi M, Narimany R, Sadat Abtahi M. Oral health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Sep;19:73. [PubMed]
16. Dhinsa K, Saha S, Tripathi AM, Dhinsa G, Rai V, Bhagchandani J. Assessment of Oral Health-related Quality of Life in Patients Suffering from Systemic Diseases. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):779-83. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2079. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. Jardim LC, Flores PT, do Carmo Dos Santos Araújo M, Chiesa J, de Moraes CMB, Antoniazzi RP. Oral health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jan;28(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04792-3. [DOI] [PubMed]
18. de Azevedo Branco LG, Oliveira SR, Corrêa JD, Calderaro DC, Mendonça SMS, de Queiroz Cunha F, et al. Oral health-related quality of life among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;38(9):2433-41. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04555-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
19. Gomes AS, Abegg C, Fachel JM. Relationship between oral clinical conditions and daily performances. Braz Oral Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;23(1):76-81. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000100013. [DOI] [PubMed]
20. Batista MJ, Perianes LB, Hilgert JB, Hugo FN, Sousa Mda L. The impacts of oral health on quality of life in working adults. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:S1806-83242014000100249. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0040. [DOI] [PubMed]
21. Drachev SN, Brenn T, Trovik TA. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Young Adults: A Survey of Russian Undergraduate Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr;15(4):719. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040719. [DOI] [PubMed]
22. Haag DG, Peres KG, Balasubramanian M, Brennan DS. Oral Conditions and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review. J Dent Res. 2017 Jul;96(8):864-74. doi: 10.1177/0022034517709737. [DOI] [PubMed]
23. Karasneh J, Al-Omiri MK, Al-Hamad KQ, Al Quran FA. Relationship between patients' oral health-related quality of life, satisfaction with dentition, and personality profiles. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Nov;10(6):E049-56. [PubMed]
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khodabakhshi H, Bagheri Moghaddam S, Mohammadi* M, Mortazavi N. Relationship between Dental Caries Index and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2024; 26 (2) :37-46
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-4464-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 26, Issue 2 (Summer 2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)