[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims and Scope
Content Coverage
Conflict of Interest
Publication Ethics
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
Indexing Databases::
Contact Us::
Contact Us
Contact Form
Site Facilities::
Search contents
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 22, Issue 4 (12-2020) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2020, 22(4): 30-39 Back to browse issues page
Effectiveness of short-term object relation psychotherapy on interpersonal relationships, self-destruct behaviors and personality organization in patients with borderline personality disorder: A clinical trial study
Fatemeh Ghanadzadegan1 , Isaac Rahimian Boogar * 2, Mehdi Pourasghar3
1- M.Sc in Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
2- Associate Professor of Health Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. , i_rahimian@semnan.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Behavioral Science Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Abstract:   (4880 Views)
Background and Objective: Among short-term therapies, psychoanalytic approaches use the therapeutic relationship more than any other approach as a context for change. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of short-term object relation psychotherapy on interpersonal relationships, self-destruct behaviors and personality organization of patients with borderline personality disorder.
Methods: This clinical trial study was done on the 20 patients with borderline personality disorder who referred to medical clinics in Sari city in northern Iran during 2020. Patients were divided into two intervention and control groups by random sampling. Patients in interventional group were received short-term object relation psychotherapy in 16 individual sessions of 45 minutes once a week. The control group did not receive any intervention. Patients completed the structured clinical interview scales of First et al (SCID-II), the Bell’s object relations inventory (BORI), self-destruct questionnaire of Sharabaf et al and Kernberg’s inventory of personality organization (IPO).
Results: Scores of interpersonal relationships, self-destructive behaviors and personality organization were significantly reduced in interventional group in compared to control group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Short-term object relation psychotherapy is an effective therapy to reduce the symptoms of patients with borderline personality disorder.
Keywords: Psychoanalytical Therapy [MeSH], Self Destructive Behavior , Interpersonal Relations [MeSH], Borderline Personality Disorder [MeSH]
Article ID: Vol22-51
Full-Text [PDF 305 kb]   (14200 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Psychiatry
References
1. Stern A. Psychoanalytic investigation of and therapy in the border line group of neuroses. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 1938; 7(4): 467-89. DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1938.11925367 [Article] [DOI]
2. Kernberg O. Borderline personality organization. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1967; 15(3): 641-85. DOI: 10.1177/000306516701500309 [Article] [DOI]
3. Sadock BJ, Ahmad S, Sadock VA. [Kaplan & Sadock's Pocket Handbook of Clinical Psychiatry]. 6th ed. Translated by: Seyed Ahmad Jalili, Farzin Rezaei. Tehran: Arjmand Publication. 2018; pp: 219-461.
4. The American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. DOI: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 [DOI]
5. Hadjipavlou G, Ogrodniczuk JS. Promising psychotherapies for personality disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Apr; 55(4): 202-10. DOI: 10.1177/070674371005500403 [DOI] [PubMed]
6. Gonzalez-Torres MA. Psychodynamic psychotherapies for borderline personality disorders. Current developments and challenges ahead. BJPsych Int. 2018 Feb; 15(1): 12-14. DOI: 10.1192/bji.2017.7 [DOI] [PubMed]
7. Brodsky BS, Groves SA, OquendoMA, MannJJ, Stanley B. Interpersonal precipitants and suicide attempts in borderline personality disorder. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2006 Jun; 36(3): 313-22. DOI: 10.1521/suli.2006.36.3.313 [DOI] [PubMed]
8. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J, Silk KR. Mental health service utilization by borderline personality disorder patients and Axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for 6 years. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jan; 65(1): 28-36. DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0105 [DOI] [PubMed]
9. Millon T. Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond (Wiley Series on Personality Processes). 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1996; pp: 106-19.
10. Kernberg OF. Object Relations Theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis. 4th ed. New York: Jason Aronson. 1976; pp: 101-229.
11. Basharpoor S, Toloi Mehmandoostolya A, Narimani M, Atadokht A. [Relation of Emotion Processing Styles and Alexithymia with Symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder]. J Bobol Univ Med Sci. 2014; 16(7): 55-62. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
12. Clarkin JF, Levy KN, Schiavi JM. Transference focused psychotherapy: Development of a psychodynamic treatment for sever personalirt disorders. Clin Neurosci Res. 2005 May; 4(5-6): 378-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnr.2005.03.003 [Article] [DOI]
13. Paris J. Chronic suicidality among patients with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jun; 53(6): 738-42. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.6.738 [DOI] [PubMed]
14. Homan P, Reddan MC, Brosch T, Koenigsberg HW, Schiller D. Aberrant link between empathy and social attribution style in borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Nov; 94: 163-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed]
15. Dimeff LA, Koerner K. Dialectical behavior therapy in clinical practice: Applications across disorders and settings. 1st ed. New York: Guilford Press. 2007; pp: 28-78.
16. Aliluo M, Sharifi M. [Borderline personality disorder]. 1st ed. Tehran: Arjomand Publication. 2012; pp: 128-45. [Persian]
17. St Clair M. Object relations and self psychology: an introduction. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing. 2000; pp: 187-96.
18. Steenbarger BN. Toward science-practice integration in brief counseling and therapy. The Counseling Psychologist. 1992 Jul; 20(3): 403-50. DOI: 10.1177/0011000092203001 [DOI] [PubMed]
19. Stadter M. Object relations brief therapy: The therapeutic relationship in short-term work. 2nd ed. Maryland: Roman and Littlefield. 2009.
20. Person ES, Cooper AM, Gabbard GO. The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychoanalysis. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Amer Psychiatric Pub Inc. 2005; pp: 43-57.
21. Levy KN, Meehan KB, Yeomans FE. An Update and Overview of the Empirical Evidence for Transference-Focused Psychotherapy and Other Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder. In: Levy R, Ablon J, Kächele H. (eds) Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. 2012; 139-67. DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-792-1_8 [Article] [DOI]
22. Nock MK. Self-Injury. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010; 6: 339-63. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131258 [Article] [DOI]
23. Adler G, Buie Jr DH. Aloneness and borderline psychopathology: the possible relevance of child development issues. Int J Psychoanal. 1979; 60(1): 83-96. [PubMed]
24. Rorie K. Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review. Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University. 2016. [Article]
25. Ryle A. Investigating the phenomenology of Borderline Personality Disorder with the States Description Procedure: clinical implications. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2007 Oct; 14(5): 329-41. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.543 [Article] [DOI]
26. Majdara E, Rahimian Boogar I, Talepasand S, Gregory R J. [The Efficacy of Dynamic Deconstructive Psychotherapy in Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder: Introducing an Evidence-Based Therapeutic Model]. Stud Med Sci. 2018; 29(6): 1-19. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
27. Hersoug AG. A closer look at good and poor outcome in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a case comparison study. Clinical Case Studies. 2010 Apr; 9(2): 135-53. DOI: 10.1177/1534650110364415 [View at Publisher] [DOI]
28. Abbass AA. Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy of treatment resistant depression: apilot study. Depress Anxiety. 2006; 23(7): 449-52. DOI: 10.1002/da.20203 [DOI] [PubMed]
29. Dabashi L, Najafi M, Rahimian Boogar I. [The effectiveness of analytical cognitive therapy in reducing the severity of impulsivity and dissociative experiences of patients with borderline personality disorder]. Master of Clinical Psychology. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Semnan University. 2015. [Persian] [Article]
30. Najjarpour Mohammad Abadi E, Ghanbari Hashem Abadi B, Mazaheri M. [The Effectiveness of Short-Term Subjective Relationship Psychotherapy on Interpersonal Sensitivity Reduction in Individuals with Avoidance Personality Syndrome]. Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy. 2017; 8(31): 79-104. DOI: 10.22054/QCCPC.2017.24455.1589 [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher] [DOI]
31. Kernberg OF. Borderline Personality Disorder. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2001; 1285-90. DOI: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03762-1 [Article] [DOI]
32. Leichsenring F, Rabung S, Leibing E. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004; 61(12): 1208-16. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1208 [Article] [DOI]
33. Nohi S, Hasani J. [The Relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Defense Mechanisms with Borderline Personality Disorder]. J Phought Behav Clin Psychol. 2017; 12(43): 57-66. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
34. Röhrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Kwiecien R, Blettner M. Sample size calculation in clinical trials: part 13 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Aug; 107(31-32): 552-56. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0552 [DOI] [PubMed]
35. Shankman SA, Funkhouser CJ, Klein DN, Davila J, Lerner D, Hee D. Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar; 27(1): e1590. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1590 [DOI] [PubMed]
36. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), Clinician Version. Washington, DC: Amer Psychiatric Pub Inc. 1997; pp: 317-60.
37. Bell M, Billington R, Becker B. A scale for the assessment of object relations: reliability, validity, and factorial invariance. J Clin Psychol. 1986 Sep; 42(5): 733-41. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198609)42:5<733::aid-jclp2270420509>3.0.co;2-c [DOI] [PubMed]
38. Aghamohammadian Sharbaf HR, Moradian Z, Baensaf N. [Self-destructive Behaviors and psychosocial correlates among Students of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad]. Research in Clinical Psycology and Counseling. 2012-2013; 2(2): 5-24. DOI: 10.22067/IJAP.V2I2.3128 [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher] [DOI]
39. Kernberg OF, Caligor E. A Psychoanalytic Theory of Personality Disorders. In: Lenzenweger MF, Clarkin JF (Eds.). Major theories of personality disorder. New York: Guilford. 2005; pp: 114-56.
40. Sharifi V, Asadi S M, Mohammadi M R, Amini H, Kaviani H, Semnani Y, et al. [Reliability and Feasibility of The Persian Version of The Structured Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV (SCID)]. Advances in Cognitive Sciences. 2004; 6(1 and 2): 10-22. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
41. Holaday M, Glidwell R. Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory (BORRTI). J Psychoeduc Assess. 2000 Mar; 18(1): 68-71. DOI: 10.1177/073428290001800109 [View at Publisher] [DOI]
42. Hadinezhad H, Tabatabaeian M, Dehghani M. [A Preliminary Study for Validity and Reliability of Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory]. Iran J Psychiatry & Clin Psychol. 2014; 20(2): 162-69. [Article in Persian] [View at Publisher]
43. Al Behbahani M, Mohammadi N. [Investigating the Psychometric Characteristics of the Kernberg Personality Inventory]. J Psychol. 2007; 11(2): 185-97. [Article in Persian] [Article]
44. Shakiba Sh, Mohammad-Khani P, Pour-Shahbaz A, Moshtagh-Bidokhti N. [The Efficacy of Brief Object Relations Psychotherapy on Reduction of Depression Severity and Interpersonal Problems of Women suffer from Major Depressive Disorder Comorbid with Cluster C Personality Disorders]. J Clin Psychol. 2011; 2(4): 29-40. DOI: 10.22075/JCP.2017.2036 [Article] [DOI]
45. Shedler J. The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2010; 65(2): 98-109. DOI: 10.1037/a0018378 [DOI] [PubMed]
46. Town JM, Abbass A, Hardy G. Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for personality disorders: a critical review of randomized controlled trials. J Pers Disord. 2011 Dec; 25(6): 723-40. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.6.723 [DOI] [PubMed]
47. Binder JL. Treatment of narcissistic problems in time-limited psychotherapy. Psychiatr Q. 1979; 51(4): 257-70. DOI: 10.1007/BF01082829 [DOI] [PubMed]
Send email to the article author

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghanadzadegan F, Rahimian Boogar I, Pourasghar M. Effectiveness of short-term object relation psychotherapy on interpersonal relationships, self-destruct behaviors and personality organization in patients with borderline personality disorder: A clinical trial study. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2020; 22 (4) :30-39
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-3731-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 22, Issue 4 (12-2020) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)