[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims and Scope
Content Coverage
Conflict of Interest
Publication Ethics
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
Indexing Databases::
Contact Us::
Contact Us
Contact Form
Site Facilities::
Search contents
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 19, Issue 3 (10-2017) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2017, 19(3): 74-79 Back to browse issues page
Reproducibility of range of lumbar motion using a modified-modified Shober's technique in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain
J Khademi * 1, MA Mohseni Bandpei2 , I Abdollahi3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Public Health School, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , sophiajavad@yahoo.com
2- Professor, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (7581 Views)
Background and Objective: Lower back pain is one of the common discomforts of the occupational-musculoskeletal system, and the scope of motion measurement is important for assessing the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. This study was carried out to evaluate the reproducibility of the modified-modified Shober's technique (MMST) in measuring the range of motion of lumbar in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, the range of motion of lumbar (flexion and extension) of 15 patients with non-specific chronic low back pain was measured in three times with modified – modified Shober's technique by two physiotherapists. To achieve this, the correlation coefficient (ICC) was used. Two measurements with an interval of one hour and one week were run to evaluate the reproducibility within-days and between-day, respectively.
Results: Flexion and extension were measured by the first assessor in within-day that showed a high reproducibility for flexion (ICC=0.88) and extension (ICC=0.71), findings also revealed an acceptable ICC for flexion (ICC=0.85) and extension (ICC=0.68) in between-days. The second assessor measurements of flexion and extension in whiten-day also presented high reproducibility for flexion (ICC=0.85) and extension (ICC=0.76); moreover, in between-days evaluation, correlation was found for flexion (ICC=0.81) and for extension (ICC=0.71).
Conclusion: This study showed that the modified-modified Shober's technique is applicable for measuring the reproducibility of range of lumbar motion in patients with non-specific chronic lumbar pain.
Keywords: Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain, Shober's technique, Lumbar motion
Full-Text [PDF 227 kb] [English Abstract]   (16660 Downloads) |   |   Abstract (HTML)  (1105 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Physiotherapy
References
1. Jin K, Sorock GS, Courtney TK. Prevalence of low back pain in three occupational groups in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. J Safety Res. 2004; 35(1): 23-28.
2. Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Fakhri M, Bagheri-Nesami M, Ahmad-Shirvani M, Khalilian AR, Shayesteh-Azar M. Occupational back pain in Iranian nurses: an epidemiological study. Br J Nurs. 2006 Sep 28-Oct; 15(17): 914-17.
3. Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Bagheri-Nesami M, Shayesteh-Azar M. Nonspecific low back pain in 5000 Iranian school- age children. J Pediatric Orthop. 2007; 27(2): 126-29. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3180317a35
4. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar; 15 (Suppl 2): S192-300.
5. Waddell G. Evaluation of results in lumbar spine surgery. Clinical outcome measures--assessment of severity. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993; 251: 134-37.
6. Hoiriis KT, Pfleger B, McDuffie FC, Cotsonis G, Elsangak O, Hinson R, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing chiropractic adjustments to muscle relaxants for subacute low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jul-Aug; 27(6): 388-98. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.05.003
7. Gourmelen J, Chastang JF, Ozguler A, Lanoë JL, Ravaud JF, Leclerc A. Frequency of low back pain among men and women aged 30 to 64 years in France. Results of two national surveys. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007 Nov; 50(8): 640-44, 633-39. [Article in English, French]
8. Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Ahmad-Shirvani M, Golbabaei N, Behtash H, Shahinfar Z, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Prevalence and risk factors associated with low back pain in Iranian surgeons. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Jul-Aug; 34(6): 362-70. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.05.010
9. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov; 31(23): 2724-27. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000244618.06877.cd
10. Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, Liu GG, Hey L. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan; 29(1): 79-86. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000105527.13866.0F
11. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999 Aug; 354(9178): 581-85. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4
12. Ekman M, Jönhagen S, Hunsche E, Jönsson L. Burden of illness of chronic low back pain in Sweden: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in primary care setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug; 30(15): 1777-85.
13. Macrae IF, Wright V. Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis. 1969 Nov; 28(6): 584-89.
14. Moll JM, Wright V. Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1971 Jul; 30(4): 381-86.
15. Fitzgerald GK, Wynveen KJ, Rheault W, Rothschild B. Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion. Phys Ther. 1983 Nov; 63(11): 1776-81.
16. Troke M, Moore AP, Maillardet FJ, Hough A, Cheek E. A new, comprehensive normative database of lumbar spine ranges of motion. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Aug; 15(4): 371-79. doi:10.1191/026921501678310171
17. Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T. Reliability of the modified-modified Schöber and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys Ther. 1993 Jan; 73(1): 33-44.
18. Richman J, Mackrides L, Prince B. Research methodology and applied statistics, a seven part series, part 3: Measurement procedures in research. Physiother Can. 1980; 32: 253-57.
19. Kinsella TD, MacDonald RF, Johnson LG. Ankylosing Spondylitis; a late re-evaluation of 92 cases. Can Med Assoc J. 1966 Jul; 95(1): 1-9.
20. Nabavi N, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Mosalla-nezhad Z, Rahgozar M. [Reliability of measuring lumbar range of motion using modified-modified schober test in healthy subjects]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2011; 12(3): 16-23. [Article in Persian]
21. Klein AB, Snyder-Mackler L, Roy SH, DeLuca CJ. Comparison of spinal mobility and isometric trunk extensor forces with electromyographic spectral analysis in identifying low back pain. Phys Ther. 1991 Jun; 71(6): 445-54.
22. Tousignant M, Poulin L, Marchand S, Viau A, Place C. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 May; 27(10): 553-59. doi:10.1080/09638280400018411
23. Rezvani A, Ergin O, Karacan I, Oncu M. Validity and reliability of the metric measurements in the assessment of lumbar spine motion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep; 37(19): E1189-96. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825ef954
24. Viitanen JV, Heikkilä S, Kokko ML, Kautiainen H. Clinical assessment of spinal mobility measurements in ankylosing spondylitis: a compact set for follow-up and trials? Clin Rheumatol. 2000; 19(2): 131-37.
Send email to the article author

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khademi J, Mohseni Bandpei M, Abdollahi I. Reproducibility of range of lumbar motion using a modified-modified Shober's technique in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2017; 19 (3) :74-79
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-3140-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 19, Issue 3 (10-2017) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)