Computational approach to the prediction of blood-brain partitioning of basic drug candidates using mixed micellar liquid chromatography

Arshadi, S

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Editorial Board

Executive Members

Instruction to Authors

Peer Review

Articles Archive

Indexing Databases

Contact Us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 19, Issue 1 (3-2017)

J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2017, 19(1): 96-102

Back to browse issues page

Computational approach to the prediction of blood-brain partitioning of basic drug candidates using mixed micellar liquid chromatography

S Arshadi ^*

Assistant Professor, Department of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran , chemistry_arshadi@pnu.ac.ir

Abstract: (8620 Views)

Background and Objective: The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is considered to be the main barrier to drug transport into the central nervous system. In this study, the capability of biopartitioning micellar chromatography (BMC) using the mixed micellar system of Brij-35/sodium dodecyl sulfate (Brij-35/SDS, 85:15 mol/mol) has been studied to predict pharmacokinetic parameter (BBB penetration ability) of 14 basic drugs.

Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, the potential of BMC using mixed micellar system (Brij-35/SDS, 85:15 mol/mol) in 0.04 M at physiological pH 7.4 was evaluated to predict pharmacokinetic parameter (BBB penetration ability) of 14 basic drugs. The regression model for the prediction of blood-brain distribution coefficient is derived from the multiple linear regression analysis using the training set in mixed micellar mobile phase. Also, the predictive ability of model was evaluated for a prediction set of 5 compounds (Chlorpromazine, Mianserin, Propranolol, Cimetidine, and Thioridazine). The fair R2 indicates good stability and predictive ability of the developed model for the drugs not included in modeling.

Results: The relationship between the BMC retention data of 14 basic drugs and their log BB parameter showed a good statistically model (R2=0.822, F=25.42, SE=0.225, R2CV=0.781).

Conclusion: This study points out the usefulness of mixed micellar solution of Brij-35/SDS, 85:15 (mol/mol) in BMC as a high-throughput primary screening tool that can provide key information about the blood-brain distribution of basic drugs in a simple and economical way.

Keywords: Blood–brain barrier, Sodium dodecyl sulfate, Polyoxyethylene (23) lauryl ether (Brij-35), Biopartitioning micellar chromatography

Full-Text [PDF 273 kb] [English Abstract] (18580 Downloads) | | Abstract (HTML) (1249 Views)

Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Physiology - Pharmacology

References

1. Molero-Monfort M, Escuder-Gilabert L, Villanueva-Camañas RM, Sagrado S, Medina-Hernández MJ. Biopartitioning micellar chromatography: an in vitro technique for predicting human drug absorption. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2001 Apr; 753(2): 225-36.

2. Odović J, Marković B, Vladimirov S, Karljiković-Rajić K. In vitro modeling of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor's absorption with chromatographic retention data and selected molecular descriptors. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014 Mar; 953-54: 102-7. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.02.004

3. Wang S, Yang G, Zhang H, Liu H, Li Z. QRAR models for cardiovascular system drugs using biopartitioning micellar chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B. 2007 Feb; 846(1-2): 329-33. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.08.027

4. Escuder-Gilabert L, Molero-Monfort M, Villanueva-Camañas RM, Sagrado S, Medina-Hernández MJ. Potential of biopartitioning micellar chromatography as an in vitro technique for predicting drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004 Aug; 807(2): 193-201.

5. Molero-Monfort M, Martín-Biosca Y, Sagrado S, Villanueva-Camañas RM, Medina-Hernández MJ. Micellar liquid chromatography for prediction of drug transport. J Chromatogr A. 2000 Feb; 870(1-2): 1-11.

6. Flaten GE, Palac Z, Engesland A, Filipović-Grčić J, Vanić Ž, Škalko-Basnet N. In vitro skin models as a tool in optimization of drug formulation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015 Jul; 75: 10-24. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2015.02.018

7. Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ. Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jul; 34(1): 207-17.

8. Van Damme S, Langenaeker W, Bultinck P. Prediction of blood-brain partitioning: a model based on ab initio calculated quantum chemical descriptors. J Mol Graph Model. 2008 Jun; 26(8): 1223-36. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.11.004

9. Norinder U, Haeberlein M. Computational approaches to the prediction of the blood-brain distribution. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002 Mar; 54(3): 291-313.

10. Hadjmohammadi M, Salary M. Biopartitioning micellar chromatography with sodium dodecyl sulfate as a pseudo α(1)-acid glycoprotein to the prediction of protein-drug binding. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013 Jan; 912: 50-5. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.11.020

11. Yin CR, Ma LY, Huang JG, Xu L, Shi ZG. Fast profiling ecotoxicity and skin permeability of benzophenone ultraviolet filters using biopartitioning micellar chromatography based on penetrable silica spheres. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2013; 804: 321-27. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2013.10.040

12. Salary M, Hadjmohammadi M. Human serum albumin-mimetic chromatography based hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide as a novel direct probe for protein binding of acidic drugs. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015 Oct; 114: 1-7. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2015.04.040

13. Waters LJ, Shahzad Y, Stephenson J. Modelling skin permeability with micellar liquid chromatography. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2013 Nov; 50(3-4): 335-40. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.08.002

14. Wu LP, Chen Y, Wang SR, Chen C, Ye LM. Quantitative retention–activity relationship models for quinolones using biopartitioning micellar chromatography. Biomedical Chromatography. 2008; 22(1): 106-14. doi:10.1002/bmc.907

15. Dobričić V, Nikolic K, Vladimirov S, Čudina O. Biopartitioning micellar chromatography as a predictive tool for skin and corneal permeability of newly synthesized 17β-carboxamide steroids. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Jun; 56: 105-12. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2014.02.007

16. Stępnik KE, Malinowska I, Rój E. In vitro and in silico determination of oral, jejunum and Caco-2 human absorption of fatty acids and polyphenols. Micellar liquid chromatography. Talanta. 2014 Dec; 130: 265-73. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.06.039

17. Stępnik KE, Malinowska I. The use of biopartitioning micellar chromatography and immobilized artificial membrane column for in silico and in vitro determination of blood-brain barrier penetration of phenols. J Chromatogr A. 2013 Apr; 1286: 127-36. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.071

18. Jäckle J. The causal theory of the resting potential of cells. J Theor Biol. 2007 Dec; 249(3): 445-63.

19. Wu LP, Cui Y, Xiong MJ, Wang SR, Chen C, Ye LM. Mixed micellar liquid chromatography methods: modelling quantitative retention-activity relationships of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Biomed Chromatogr. 2008 Nov; 22(11): 1243-51. doi:10.1002/bmc.1053

20. Chen Y, Wu LP, Chen C, Ye LM. Development of predictive quantitative retention–activity relationship models of alkaloids by mixed micellar liquid chromatography. Biomedical Chromatography. 2009; 24(2): 195-201. doi:10.1002/bmc.1272

21. dos Santos WL, Rahman J, Klein N, Male DK. Distribution and analysis of surface charge on brain endothelium in vitro and in situ. Acta Neuropathol. 1995; 90(3): 305-11.

22. Wu LP, Chen C, Sun CJ, Ye LM. QRAR Models for Diuretics using mixed micellar liquid chromatography. J Bioequiv Availab. 2011; 3(7): 169-73. doi:10.4172/jbb.1000079

23. Wold S. Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models. Technometrics. 1978 Nov; 20(4): 397-405. doi:10.2307/1267639

24. Cramer RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 1988 Aug; 110(18): 5959-67. doi:10.1021/ja00226a005

25. Osten DW. Selection of optimal regression models via cross-validation. Journal of Chemometrics. 1988 Jan; 2(1): 39-48. doi:10.1002/cem.1180020106

26. Feher M, Sourial E, Schmidt JM. A simple model for the prediction of blood-brain partitioning. Int J Pharm. 2000 May; 201(2): 239-47.

27. Quiٌones-Torrelo C, Sagrado S, Villanueva-Camaٌas RM, Medina- Hernández MJ. Development of predictive retention−activity relationship models of tricyclic antidepressants by micellar liquid chromatography. J Med Chem. 1999; 42(16): 3154-62. doi:10.1021/jm9910369

28. Wan H, Ahman M, Holmén AG. Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs. J Med Chem. 2009 Mar; 52(6): 1693-700. doi:10.1021/jm801441s

29. Martı́nez-Pla JJ, Sagrado S, Villanueva-Camañas RM, Medina-Hernández MJ. Retention–property relationships of anticonvulsant drugs by biopartitioning micellar chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications. 2001; 757 (1): 89–99. doi:10.1016/ S0378-4347(01)00124-4

30. Liu J, Sun J, Sui X, Wang Y, Hou Y, He Z. Predicting blood–brain barrier penetration of drugs by microemulsion liquid chromatography with corrected retention factor. J Chromatogr A. 2008; 1198-99: 164-72. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.065

31. Platts JA, Abraham MH, Zhao YH, Hersey A, Ijaz L, Butina D. Correlation and prediction of a large blood-brain distribution data set--an LFER study. Eur J Med Chem. 2001 Sep; 36(9): 719-30.

32. Vilar S, Chakrabarti M, Costanzi S. Prediction of passive blood-brain partitioning: straightforward and effective classification models based on in silico derived physicochemical descriptors. J Mol Graph Model. 2010 Jun; 28(8): 899-903. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.03.010

Send email to the article author

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Arshadi S. Computational approach to the prediction of blood-brain partitioning of basic drug candidates using mixed micellar liquid chromatography . J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2017; 19 (1) :96-102
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-3023-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 19, Issue 1 (3-2017)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660