[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board::
Executive Members::
Instruction to Authors::
Peer Review::
Articles Archive::
Indexing Databases::
Contact Us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: Volume 15, Issue 2 (7-2013) ::
J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2013, 15(2): 1-7 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of close and open interlocking intramedullary nailing treatment of femoral shaft fractures
Khajemozafari J * 1, Peivandi MT , Mostafavian Z2 , Meftah Sh3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedic, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , mozafari.ortho@gmail.com
2- Social Medicin, Department of Social Medicin, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Resident of Orthopaedic, Department of Orthopaedic, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (12750 Views)
Background and Objective: Femoral shaft traumatic fracture is one of the major causes of mortality and morbidity. Nowadays,the standard treatment method in adult is reduction with femoral interlocking intramedullary nailing. This study was performed to compare the open and closed methods femoral interlocking intramedullary nailingin femoral shaft fractures treatment. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial study was done on 40 18-50 year old patients (33 men and 7 women with mean age of 26.3 years) with femoral shaft closed fracture who were referred to the Shahid Kamyab hospital of Mashhad, Iran during 2007-08. Patients were divided into two 20 membered groups of open and close femoral interlocking intramedullary nailing treatment. Subjects were followed for one year and the :::::union::::: time, infection and non-:::::union::::: level were measured. Clinical and radiological findings were analyzed using SPSS-13, Student’s t-test and Fisher's exact test. Results: 97.5% of :::::union::::: was obtained within six months in both groups. Full weight bearing was determined 6-12 weeks (mean of 9.3 weeks) in close and 12-16 weeks (mean of 13.25 weeks) in open reduction. Complications included non-:::::union::::: in open (one patient, 5%), infection in open (one patient, 5%), shortening in both (one patientin, 5%), limited range of movement in both (one patient, 5%) and malrotation in close (one patient, 5%) groups. Close reduction group showed higher rate of radiologic callus formation and earlier full weight bearing than open reduction group (P<0.005), but :::::union::::: rate was not significant. Conclusion: This study showed that there is no difference between final :::::union::::: rate of open and close reduction by interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures.
Keywords: Reamed Interlocking Intramedullary Nailing, :::union::: Time, Infection, Non-:::union:::, Open Reduction, Close Reduction, Femoral Shaft Fracture
Full-Text [PDF 296 kb] [English Abstract]   (21402 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Articles | Subject: Orthopaedics
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khajemozafari J, Peivandi MT, Mostafavian Z, Meftah Sh. Comparison of close and open interlocking intramedullary nailing treatment of femoral shaft fractures. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2013; 15 (2) :1-7
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/journal/article-1-1711-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 2 (7-2013) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گرگان Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)