1. Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, Horner K, Mannocci F. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation. IntEndod J 2009;42(9):831-8 [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
2. LyroudiaKM, DourouVI, PantelidouOC, LabrianidisT, PitasIK. Internal root resorption studied by radiography, stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscope and computerized 3D reconstructive method. Dent Traumatol 2002; 18(3):148-52. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
3. Kamburoglu K, Kursun S. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities. IntEndod J 2010; 43(9):798-807. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
4. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Ingle's Endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2019. P 1370. [
Google Scholar]
5. White SC, Pharoah MJ, eds. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation.6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. P 215-30,355. [
Google Scholar]
6. Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Chivian N. The Role of EndodonticsAfter Dental Traumatic Injuries. In: Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, editors. Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2016. P 618-50. [
view at publisher] [
Google Scholar]
7. Caliskan MK and M. Turkun M. Prognosis of permanent teeth with internal resorption: a clinical review, Dent Traumatol 1997; 13(2):75-81. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
8. White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52(4):689-705. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
9. Kamburoglu K, Kursun S, Yuksel S, Oztas B. Observer ability to detect ex vivo Simulated internal or external cervical root resorption. J Endod 2011; 37(2):168-75. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
10. Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Mattar R, ValladaresNeto J, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2009; 35(11):1491-7. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
11. Cohenca N, Simon JH, Mathur A, Malfaz JM. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveolar trauma. Part 2: root resorption. Dent Traumatol 2007; 23(2):105-13. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
12. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2: Cone beam computed tomography. IntEndod J 2009; 42(6):463-75. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
13. Kamburoglu K, Barenboim SF, Kaffe I. Comparison of Conventional film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of simulated internal resorption cavities: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2008; 105(6):790-7. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
14. Khalilak Z, Dadresanfar B, Mehralizade S, fallahdoost A, Mokhberi L. Comparison of The Diagnostic Quality Of the Conventional and Digital Radiography in Detection of External Root Resorption Cavities (Invitro). J Res Dent Sci 2012; 8(4):194-9. [
Google Scholar]
15. Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry:spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am JOrthodDentofacialOrthop. 2006; 130(3):410-6. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
16. Lai C, Bornstein M, Mock L, Heuberger B, Dietrich T, KatasarosC.Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions ofneighbouring teeth:a radiographic analysisusing cone-beam computedtomography.European Journal of Orthodontics 2012;35(2013)529-538 [
view at publisher] [
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjs037] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
17. White SC,PharoahMJ.Oral radiology principle and interpretation.6th ed.Philadelphia:Elsevier;2019.71-92,265-277. [
Google Scholar]
18. Marques AP, Perrella A, Arita ES, Pereira MF, Cavalcanti M. Assessment of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions by cone beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res. 2010 Oct/Dec; 24(4):467-74. [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
19. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V, Strocchi S, Pozzi TS, Leonardi A, et al. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Radiol Med. [Comparative Study; Journal Article]. 2010; 115(4):600-11. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
20. Farhadi N, Shokraneh A, Saatchi M. Effect of different levels of sharpness processing filter on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length. Dental Hypotheses. 2016; 7(1):15. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
Google Scholar]
21. Akarslan ZZ, Akdevelioğlu M, Güngör K, Erten H. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth. Dentomaxillofacial. Radiol. . 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
22. 36-Westphalen VPD, de Moraes IG, Westphalen FH, Martins WD, Souza PC. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorptions: a comparative study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2014;33(4):233-235 [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
23. Guarnieri R, Cavallini C, Vernucci R, Vichi M, Leonardi R, Barbato E.Impacted maxillary canines and root resorption of adjacent teeth:A retrospective observational study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2016;21(6)743-50 [
DOI] [
PMID] [
PMCID] [
Google Scholar]
24. MehrAliZadeh S, Talayi poor A, Mehrvarzfar P, Edalat M, SHarifiSHoushtari S. Comparison between digital intraoral radiography (PSP) and Cone Beam CT images in detection internal root resorption (in-vitro study). J Res Dent Sci. 2016; 13(2):102-8. [
view at publisher] [
Google Scholar]
25. Scarfe W, Farman A. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principle and interpretation. 6th ed. Louis Missouri: Mosby USA; 2009. P.225-243. [
view at publisher] [
Google Scholar]
26. Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Mattar R, ValladaresNeto J, et all. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2009; 35(11):1491-7. [
view at publisher] [
DOI] [
PMID] [
Google Scholar]
27. Kajkolahi A. Evaluation of the magnification and brightness effect for detecting impacted tooth-induced external root resorption, in mid root area of single root teeth in cone beam computed tomography( An ex-vivo study). Doctoral dissertation.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz JundiShapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 2018.